<--- Score
103. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Network appliance? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
104. Are the Network appliance requirements testable?
<--- Score
105. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
106. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Network appliance goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
107. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
108. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Network appliance brings?
<--- Score
109. What is the scope of Network appliance?
<--- Score
110. Has the Network appliance work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
111. Are the Network appliance requirements complete?
<--- Score
112. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
113. Is Network appliance required?
<--- Score
114. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
115. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
116. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
117. Is Network appliance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
118. What was the context?
<--- Score
119. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Network appliance work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
120. Is there a critical path to deliver Network appliance results?
<--- Score
121. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
122. Who is gathering Network appliance information?
<--- Score
123. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
124. How would you define Network appliance leadership?
<--- Score
125. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
126. Is there a Network appliance management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
127. Have all basic functions of Network appliance been defined?
<--- Score
128. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
129. Is the Network appliance scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
130. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
131. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
132. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
133. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Network appliance Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Will Network appliance have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?
<--- Score
2. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
3. Which Network appliance impacts are significant?
<--- Score
4. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
5. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
6. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
7. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<---
