style="font-size:15px;"> 65. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
66. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
67. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
68. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
69. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
70. What is the context?
<--- Score
71. Is special Event planning user knowledge required?
<--- Score
72. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
73. How do you think the partners involved in Event planning would have defined success?
<--- Score
74. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
75. Is there any additional Event planning definition of success?
<--- Score
76. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
77. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
78. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Event planning brings?
<--- Score
79. Do you all define Event planning in the same way?
<--- Score
80. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
81. What are the core elements of the Event planning business case?
<--- Score
82. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
83. Is the Event planning scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
84. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
85. Who approved the Event planning scope?
<--- Score
86. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
87. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
88. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
89. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
90. Is the Event planning scope manageable?
<--- Score
91. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
92. Is there a Event planning management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
93. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
94. Is there a critical path to deliver Event planning results?
<--- Score
95. Are accountability and ownership for Event planning clearly defined?
<--- Score
96. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
97. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
98. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Event planning? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
99. What would be the goal or target for a Event planning’s improvement team?
<--- Score
100. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
101. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
102. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
103. Is there a clear Event planning case definition?
<--- Score
104. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
105. Have all basic functions of Event planning been defined?
<--- Score
106. What are the record-keeping requirements of Event planning activities?
<--- Score
107. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
108. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<---
