defined, what are they?
<--- Score
64. What sources do you use to gather information for a Theory of governance study?
<--- Score
65. How does the Theory of governance manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
66. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
67. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
68. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
69. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
70. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
71. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
72. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
73. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
74. What is the scope?
<--- Score
75. Do you have a Theory of governance success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
76. What happens if Theory of governance’s scope changes?
<--- Score
77. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
78. Is Theory of governance currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
79. Is the scope of Theory of governance defined?
<--- Score
80. Has a Theory of governance requirement not been met?
<--- Score
81. What are the core elements of the Theory of governance business case?
<--- Score
82. How do you hand over Theory of governance context?
<--- Score
83. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
84. What are the Theory of governance use cases?
<--- Score
85. How are consistent Theory of governance definitions important?
<--- Score
86. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Theory of governance goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
87. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
88. Is Theory of governance required?
<--- Score
89. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
90. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
91. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
92. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
93. How have you defined all Theory of governance requirements first?
<--- Score
94. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
95. Is there a clear Theory of governance case definition?
<--- Score
96. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
97. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
98. How do you manage changes in Theory of governance requirements?
<--- Score
99. Has the Theory of governance work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
100. What gets examined?
<--- Score
101. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
102. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
103. Who is gathering Theory of governance information?
<--- Score
104. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
105. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
106. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
107. What is the context?
<--- Score
108. How often are the team meetings?
<---
