Score
18. Have you included everything in your Theory of governance cost models?
<--- Score
19. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
20. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
21. What are your customers expectations and measures?
<--- Score
22. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
23. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
24. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?
<--- Score
25. What details are required of the Theory of governance cost structure?
<--- Score
26. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
27. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
28. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
29. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
30. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?
<--- Score
31. How can you reduce costs?
<--- Score
32. How can you measure the performance?
<--- Score
33. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
34. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
35. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
36. What is your decision requirements diagram?
<--- Score
37. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
38. Are indirect costs charged to the Theory of governance program?
<--- Score
39. How can a Theory of governance test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
40. How much does it cost?
<--- Score
41. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to Theory of governance? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?
<--- Score
42. How do you measure efficient delivery of Theory of governance services?
<--- Score
43. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
44. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
45. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
46. Among the Theory of governance product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
47. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?
<--- Score
48. Where is the cost?
<--- Score
49. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
50. What is your Theory of governance quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
51. What are the current costs of the Theory of governance process?
<--- Score
52. Do you have any cost Theory of governance limitation requirements?
<--- Score
53. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
54. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
55. Is the cost worth the Theory of governance effort ?
<--- Score
56. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Theory of governance services/products?
<--- Score
57. How will you measure your Theory of governance effectiveness?
<--- Score
58. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
59. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
60. Are the Theory of governance benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
61. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
62. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
63. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
64.
