25. What are the clients issues and concerns?
<--- Score
26. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
27. Are there recognized Field applications engineering problems?
<--- Score
28. Think about the people you identified for your Field applications engineering project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
29. What would happen if Field applications engineering weren’t done?
<--- Score
30. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
31. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
32. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
33. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Field applications engineering delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
34. Have you identified your Field applications engineering key performance indicators?
<--- Score
35. Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
36. Do you know what you need to know about Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
37. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
38. What is the extent or complexity of the Field applications engineering problem?
<--- Score
39. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Field applications engineering will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
40. Is it needed?
<--- Score
41. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Field applications engineering project?
<--- Score
42. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
43. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
44. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?
<--- Score
45. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
46. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
47. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
48. What extra resources will you need?
<--- Score
49. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
50. Does your organization need more Field applications engineering education?
<--- Score
51. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
52. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
53. Do you recognize Field applications engineering achievements?
<--- Score
54. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
55. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
56. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Field applications engineering? In other words, what are the risks, if Field applications engineering does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
57. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
58. What are the expected benefits of Field applications engineering to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
59. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
60. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
61. What vendors make products that address the Field applications engineering needs?
<--- Score
62. What Field applications engineering capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
63. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
64. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Field applications engineering leader?
<--- Score
65. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
66. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
67. How are the Field applications engineering’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<---
