Score
68. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Field applications engineering team, Field applications engineering itself?
<--- Score
69. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
70. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
71. What are your needs in relation to Field applications engineering skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
72. How do you recognize an Field applications engineering objection?
<--- Score
73. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
74. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
75. How do you assess your Field applications engineering workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
76. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Field applications engineering research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
77. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
78. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Field applications engineering as an effective investment?
<--- Score
79. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
80. Why the need?
<--- Score
81. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
82. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
83. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
84. What is the Field applications engineering problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
85. What information do users need?
<--- Score
86. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
87. What Field applications engineering events should you attend?
<--- Score
88. When a Field applications engineering manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
89. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
90. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
91. What Field applications engineering coordination do you need?
<--- Score
92. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Field applications engineering?
<--- Score
93. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
94. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
95. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
96. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
97. Who should resolve the Field applications engineering issues?
<--- Score
98. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
99. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
100. Does Field applications engineering create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Field applications engineering Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you catch Field applications engineering definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
2. What happens if Field applications engineering’s scope changes?
<--- Score
3. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
4. How would you define Field applications engineering leadership?
<--- Score
5. Is there a critical path to deliver Field applications engineering results?
<---
