Management Plan: Technical Efficiency213
3.0 Executing Process Group: Technical Efficiency215
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Technical Efficiency217
3.2 Change Request: Technical Efficiency219
3.3 Change Log: Technical Efficiency221
3.4 Decision Log: Technical Efficiency223
3.5 Quality Audit: Technical Efficiency225
3.6 Team Directory: Technical Efficiency228
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Technical Efficiency230
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Technical Efficiency232
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Technical Efficiency234
3.10 Issue Log: Technical Efficiency236
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Technical Efficiency238
4.1 Project Performance Report: Technical Efficiency240
4.2 Variance Analysis: Technical Efficiency242
4.3 Earned Value Status: Technical Efficiency244
4.4 Risk Audit: Technical Efficiency246
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Technical Efficiency248
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Technical Efficiency250
5.0 Closing Process Group: Technical Efficiency252
5.1 Procurement Audit: Technical Efficiency254
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Technical Efficiency256
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Technical Efficiency258
5.4 Lessons Learned: Technical Efficiency260
Index262
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Do you recognize Technical efficiency achievements?
<--- Score
2. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
3. Will Technical efficiency deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
4. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
5. Where do you need to exercise leadership?
<--- Score
6. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
7. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
8. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
9. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
10. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
11. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
12. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
13. What do employees need in the short term?
<--- Score
14. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
15. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
16. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
17. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
18. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Technical efficiency will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
19. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Technical efficiency?
<--- Score
20. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
21. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Technical efficiency as an effective investment?
<--- Score
22. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
23. Consider your own Technical efficiency project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
24. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Technical efficiency? In other words, what are the risks, if Technical efficiency does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
25. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
26. What are the expected benefits of Technical efficiency to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
27. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
28. What else needs to be measured?
<---
