Score
4. What are the Health management information system use cases?
<--- Score
5. How can the value of Health management information system be defined?
<--- Score
6. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
7. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
8. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
9. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Health management information system leverage and how?
<--- Score
10. How do you catch Health management information system definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
11. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Health management information system?
<--- Score
12. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
13. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
14. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
15. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
16. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
17. Are the Health management information system requirements complete?
<--- Score
18. How have you defined all Health management information system requirements first?
<--- Score
19. What was the context?
<--- Score
20. Is there any additional Health management information system definition of success?
<--- Score
21. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Health management information system work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
22. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
23. How do you gather Health management information system requirements?
<--- Score
24. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
25. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
26. Is there a critical path to deliver Health management information system results?
<--- Score
27. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
28. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
29. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
30. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
31. What is in scope?
<--- Score
32. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
33. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Health management information system results are met?
<--- Score
34. Is Health management information system linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
35. What is the scope of Health management information system?
<--- Score
36. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
37. Are accountability and ownership for Health management information system clearly defined?
<--- Score
38. What Health management information system requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
39. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
40. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
41. How does the Health management information system manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
42. Do you all define Health management information system in the same way?
<--- Score
43. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
44. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
45. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Health management information system? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
46.
