(not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
15. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
16. Do you all define Risk based internal auditing in the same way?
<--- Score
17. Will a Risk based internal auditing production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
18. Is the Risk based internal auditing scope manageable?
<--- Score
19. Is there a critical path to deliver Risk based internal auditing results?
<--- Score
20. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Risk based internal auditing leverage and how?
<--- Score
21. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
22. Is there any additional Risk based internal auditing definition of success?
<--- Score
23. Are accountability and ownership for Risk based internal auditing clearly defined?
<--- Score
24. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
25. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
26. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
27. Who approved the Risk based internal auditing scope?
<--- Score
28. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
29. How do you manage unclear Risk based internal auditing requirements?
<--- Score
30. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
31. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
32. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
33. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
34. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
35. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Risk based internal auditing goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
36. Why are you doing Risk based internal auditing and what is the scope?
<--- Score
37. What is in scope?
<--- Score
38. Has the Risk based internal auditing work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
39. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
40. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
41. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Risk based internal auditing changes?
<--- Score
42. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
43. How do you manage changes in Risk based internal auditing requirements?
<--- Score
44. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
45. Are the Risk based internal auditing requirements testable?
<--- Score
46. What would be the goal or target for a Risk based internal auditing’s improvement team?
<--- Score
47. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
48. What Risk based internal auditing requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
49. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
50. What are (control) requirements for Risk based internal auditing Information?
<--- Score
51. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
52. How do you catch Risk based internal auditing definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
53. Is Risk based internal auditing currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
54. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Risk based internal auditing results are met?
<--- Score
55. How are consistent Risk based internal auditing definitions important?
<--- Score
56.
