Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
57. How have you defined all Risk based internal auditing requirements first?
<--- Score
58. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
59. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
60. What is the scope of Risk based internal auditing?
<--- Score
61. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
62. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
63. What gets examined?
<--- Score
64. Is Risk based internal auditing linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
65. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
66. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
67. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
68. Is there a clear Risk based internal auditing case definition?
<--- Score
69. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
70. Is there a Risk based internal auditing management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
71. Are the Risk based internal auditing requirements complete?
<--- Score
72. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
73. How would you define Risk based internal auditing leadership?
<--- Score
74. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
75. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
76. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
77. Is the Risk based internal auditing scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
78. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
79. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Risk based internal auditing work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
80. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
81. What system do you use for gathering Risk based internal auditing information?
<--- Score
82. Do you have a Risk based internal auditing success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
83. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
84. What happens if Risk based internal auditing’s scope changes?
<--- Score
85. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
86. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
87. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
88. What is the definition of Risk based internal auditing excellence?
<--- Score
89. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
90. Who are the Risk based internal auditing improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
91. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
92. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
93. What are the Risk based internal auditing tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
94. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
95. What Risk based internal auditing services do you require?
<--- Score
96. How did the Risk based internal auditing manager receive input to the development of a Risk based internal auditing improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
97. What are the record-keeping requirements of Risk based internal auditing activities?
<--- Score
98. Is the scope of Risk based internal auditing defined?
<--- Score
99. Are there different segments of customers?
<---
