Score
10. Is there any additional Private electronic market definition of success?
<--- Score
11. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
12. How did the Private electronic market manager receive input to the development of a Private electronic market improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
13. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Private electronic market results are met?
<--- Score
14. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
15. Are accountability and ownership for Private electronic market clearly defined?
<--- Score
16. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
17. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
18. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
19. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Private electronic market brings?
<--- Score
20. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
21. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
22. Will team members perform Private electronic market work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
23. How do you hand over Private electronic market context?
<--- Score
24. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
25. What is in scope?
<--- Score
26. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
27. How do you gather Private electronic market requirements?
<--- Score
28. Who approved the Private electronic market scope?
<--- Score
29. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
30. What is the scope of the Private electronic market work?
<--- Score
31. Are improvement team members fully trained on Private electronic market?
<--- Score
32. How are consistent Private electronic market definitions important?
<--- Score
33. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
34. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
35. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
36. How would you define Private electronic market leadership?
<--- Score
37. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
38. Is special Private electronic market user knowledge required?
<--- Score
39. What is the definition of Private electronic market excellence?
<--- Score
40. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
41. Do you have a Private electronic market success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
42. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
43. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
44. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
45. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
46. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
47. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
48. What would be the goal or target for a Private electronic market’s improvement team?
<--- Score
49. Is the Private electronic market scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
50. What Private electronic market requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
51. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
52. What was the context?
<---
