organization, how susceptible is it to All-source intelligence changes?
<--- Score
57. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
58. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
59. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
60. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does All-source intelligence leverage and how?
<--- Score
61. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
62. Why are you doing All-source intelligence and what is the scope?
<--- Score
63. How do you hand over All-source intelligence context?
<--- Score
64. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
65. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the All-source intelligence goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
66. What are the All-source intelligence use cases?
<--- Score
67. What All-source intelligence requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
68. What happens if All-source intelligence’s scope changes?
<--- Score
69. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
70. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
71. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
72. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
73. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
74. Are improvement team members fully trained on All-source intelligence?
<--- Score
75. What is the context?
<--- Score
76. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
77. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
78. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
79. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
80. How does the All-source intelligence manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
81. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
82. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
83. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on All-source intelligence?
<--- Score
84. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
85. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
86. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
87. What gets examined?
<--- Score
88. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
89. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
90. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
91. What would be the goal or target for a All-source intelligence’s improvement team?
<--- Score
92. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
93. How do you think the partners involved in All-source intelligence would have defined success?
<--- Score
94. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
95. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
96. What are the record-keeping requirements of All-source intelligence activities?
<--- Score
97. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
98. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
99. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
100. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform All-source intelligence work? How is the team addressing them?
<---
