<--- Score
8. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
9. Will team members regularly document their Health Services Management Research work?
<--- Score
10. How does the Health Services Management Research manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
11. What are the Health Services Management Research use cases?
<--- Score
12. What is the scope of the Health Services Management Research work?
<--- Score
13. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
14. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Health Services Management Research changes?
<--- Score
15. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
16. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
17. Are the Health Services Management Research requirements complete?
<--- Score
18. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
19. How do you think the partners involved in Health Services Management Research would have defined success?
<--- Score
20. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
21. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
22. Is the Health Services Management Research scope manageable?
<--- Score
23. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Health Services Management Research results are met?
<--- Score
24. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
25. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
26. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
27. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
28. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
29. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
30. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
31. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
32. How do you manage changes in Health Services Management Research requirements?
<--- Score
33. What is the scope of the Health Services Management Research effort?
<--- Score
34. Will team members perform Health Services Management Research work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
35. What are the core elements of the Health Services Management Research business case?
<--- Score
36. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
37. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
38. Is there any additional Health Services Management Research definition of success?
<--- Score
39. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
40. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
41. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
42. When is/was the Health Services Management Research start date?
<--- Score
43. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
44. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
45. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
46. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Health Services Management Research? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
47. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
48. What is the context?
<--- Score
49. What are (control) requirements for Health Services Management Research Information?
<---
