In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
104. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
105. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
106. Who are the Information criteria improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
107. What is the scope of Information criteria?
<--- Score
108. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
109. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
110. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
111. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
112. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
113. Will team members perform Information criteria work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
114. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
115. What are the core elements of the Information criteria business case?
<--- Score
116. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
117. What gets examined?
<--- Score
118. Have all basic functions of Information criteria been defined?
<--- Score
119. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
120. Has the Information criteria work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
121. What are (control) requirements for Information criteria Information?
<--- Score
122. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
123. Is Information criteria required?
<--- Score
124. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
125. How are consistent Information criteria definitions important?
<--- Score
126. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
127. Is the Information criteria scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
128. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
129. Is there a clear Information criteria case definition?
<--- Score
130. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
131. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
132. How does the Information criteria manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
133. Is the Information criteria scope manageable?
<--- Score
134. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
135. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
136. What happens if Information criteria’s scope changes?
<--- Score
137. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
138. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Information criteria Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
2. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
3. Are there
