to gather?
<--- Score
17. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
18. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
19. Have all basic functions of Interval Laboratory been defined?
<--- Score
20. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
21. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
22. What is the scope of Interval Laboratory?
<--- Score
23. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Interval Laboratory work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
24. What is the scope of the Interval Laboratory work?
<--- Score
25. What system do you use for gathering Interval Laboratory information?
<--- Score
26. How can the value of Interval Laboratory be defined?
<--- Score
27. Why are you doing Interval Laboratory and what is the scope?
<--- Score
28. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
29. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
30. How did the Interval Laboratory manager receive input to the development of a Interval Laboratory improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
31. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
32. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
33. What is the scope?
<--- Score
34. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
35. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
36. What are the Interval Laboratory tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
37. Is special Interval Laboratory user knowledge required?
<--- Score
38. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
39. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
40. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
41. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
42. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
43. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
44. Are accountability and ownership for Interval Laboratory clearly defined?
<--- Score
45. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
46. Who are the Interval Laboratory improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
47. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
48. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
49. How do you think the partners involved in Interval Laboratory would have defined success?
<--- Score
50. Is there any additional Interval Laboratory definition of success?
<--- Score
51. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
52. How will the Interval Laboratory team and the group measure complete success of Interval Laboratory?
<--- Score
53. What Interval Laboratory services do you require?
<--- Score
54. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
55. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
56. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
57. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
58. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
59. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
60. What Interval Laboratory requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
61.
