Which needs are not included or involved?
<--- Score
75. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
76. What Personnel director problem should be solved?
<--- Score
77. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
78. Do you know what you need to know about Personnel director?
<--- Score
79. What is the Personnel director problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
80. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
81. Think about the people you identified for your Personnel director project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
82. Which information does the Personnel director business case need to include?
<--- Score
83. How do you recognize an Personnel director objection?
<--- Score
84. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
85. What would happen if Personnel director weren’t done?
<--- Score
86. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
87. Are there Personnel director problems defined?
<--- Score
88. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Personnel director?
<--- Score
89. How are the Personnel director’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
90. What Personnel director capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Personnel director Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
2. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
3. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
4. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
5. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
6. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
7. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
8. Who are the Personnel director improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
9. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
10. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
11. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
12. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
13. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Personnel director?
<--- Score
14. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
15. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
16. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Personnel director leverage and how?
<--- Score
17. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
18. How did the Personnel director manager receive input to the development of a Personnel director improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
19. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
20. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
21. What is out-of-scope initially?
<---
