Score
50. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
51. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
52. Has a Ethereum Blockchain as a Service requirement not been met?
<--- Score
53. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
54. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
55. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
56. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
57. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
58. How does the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
59. What Ethereum Blockchain as a Service services do you require?
<--- Score
60. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
61. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
62. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
63. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
64. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
65. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
66. Is Ethereum Blockchain as a Service linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
67. How will the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service team and the group measure complete success of Ethereum Blockchain as a Service?
<--- Score
68. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
69. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
70. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
71. Are the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service requirements complete?
<--- Score
72. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
73. Is there any additional Ethereum Blockchain as a Service definition of success?
<--- Score
74. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
75. How did the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service manager receive input to the development of a Ethereum Blockchain as a Service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
76. When is/was the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service start date?
<--- Score
77. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
78. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Ethereum Blockchain as a Service work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
79. Who approved the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service scope?
<--- Score
80. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
81. How do you think the partners involved in Ethereum Blockchain as a Service would have defined success?
<--- Score
82. Is special Ethereum Blockchain as a Service user knowledge required?
<--- Score
83. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
84. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
85. Do you have a Ethereum Blockchain as a Service success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
86. What are the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
87. How are consistent Ethereum Blockchain as a Service definitions important?
<--- Score
88. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
89. Are the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service requirements testable?
<--- Score
90. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
91. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
92. Does the team have regular meetings?
