Score
102. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
103. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Health risk assessments goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
104. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
105. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
106. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
107. Is there a Health risk assessments management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
108. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
109. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
110. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
111. How do you hand over Health risk assessments context?
<--- Score
112. What are (control) requirements for Health risk assessments Information?
<--- Score
113. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Health risk assessments?
<--- Score
114. What system do you use for gathering Health risk assessments information?
<--- Score
115. What are the record-keeping requirements of Health risk assessments activities?
<--- Score
116. What is the scope of the Health risk assessments effort?
<--- Score
117. Is there any additional Health risk assessments definition of success?
<--- Score
118. How do you catch Health risk assessments definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
119. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
120. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
121. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
122. Do you have a Health risk assessments success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
123. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
124. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
125. How do you think the partners involved in Health risk assessments would have defined success?
<--- Score
126. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
127. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
128. Is the Health risk assessments scope manageable?
<--- Score
129. Is the scope of Health risk assessments defined?
<--- Score
130. Is Health risk assessments required?
<--- Score
131. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
132. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
133. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
134. How does the Health risk assessments manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
135. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
136. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Health risk assessments brings?
<--- Score
137. Who is gathering Health risk assessments information?
<--- Score
138. What are the Health risk assessments use cases?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Health risk assessments Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly
