present work could rightfully be regarded as the concluding volume of Zakaria Bashier’s earlier three works on Sīrah and the reader will get a full picture of the extraordinary life and contribution of the Prophet Muḥammad (peace be upon him) if all the four volumes are studied in proper sequence.
I take this opportunity to thank the Foundation production team, especially Br Nasir Cadir for ensuring the publication of this title. May Allah reward all those who helped in its production and enable us to emulate the Prophet’s role model. (Amin)
| 28 Ramadan 1426H | M. Manazir Ahsan |
| 31 October 2005 CE | Director General |
One of the major charges pressed against Islam is that it is a violent religion which was spread by the sword. Quite a few of the orientalists of old and new have pressed this charge to its extreme limits, in every field of their study of Islam, and it has now been given new vogue and momentum after the sorrowful events of September 11.
The orientalists claim that what had been a peaceful and dovish Islam, in its initial Makkan phase, had suddenly become aggressive and power-seeking, when it assumed statehood in its Madīnan Phase. The Prophet (peace be upon him) himself was accused of being inconsistent in his practices in Madīnah with what he used to preach in Makkah about tolerance and freedom of religious belief, and that there is no compulsion in religion.
Be that as it may, some recent studies of this topic appeared which tried to interpret this change in the course of Islam – i.e. from being peaceful and tolerant in Makkah, to being violent and aggressive in Madīnah – by making use of the concept of Qur’ānic verses which were abrogated by Allah, Himself. It is alleged, in these recent studies, that the early Makkan Qur’ānic verses calling for religious tolerance and peaceful coexistence with the adherents of other religious faiths, especially with the People of the Book, were abrogated by the so-called verses of the sword of Sūrah al-Tawbah (Repentance), i.e. verses numbers 5 and 29.
Then when the sacred months are drawn away, slay the idolaters wherever you find them; and take them, and confine them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they repent, and perform the prayer, and pay zakāh (alms), then let them go their way. [al-Tawbah 9:5]
Fight those who believe not in God and the Last Day, and do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden, such men as practise not the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book, until they pay jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. [al-Tawbah 9:29]
This reading of the situation, which inevitably depicts Islam as a hawkish, violent religion, seems to me to be plainly mistaken. The basic position of Islam is that religious convictions can only be disseminated by means of valid arguments and persuasive proofs. No man can be made to believe sincerely in any ideas or theories through compulsion or force. For a coerced person may pretend to believe under the force of fear and intimidation, but that is not genuine faith, since it will be forsaken at the earliest chance that freedom of thought presents itself.
The theory put forward in this study [War and Peace in the life of the Prophet Muḥammad (peace be upon him)] is that peace and peaceful coexistence with people of other faiths is the rule and custom in Islamic sharīʿah and Islamic way of life. Islam resorts to war only when it is compelled to defend itself against outside aggression. Almost all the historic wars waged by Islam can be construed as being just wars launched in self-defense, or against tyrant rulers and regimes under which men, women and children were oppressed and made powerless, be they Muslim or non-Muslim. Especially, war is construed as legitimate against tyrants and dictators who prevent the right of man to worship God Almighty freely and without fear or intimidation. It does not matter in Islam which religion these oppressed men, women and children are professing. They do not have to be Muslims; they could be Jews or Christians or followers of any other religious denomination, especially if it is deemed to be divinely revealed.
I started writing this manuscript in the summer of 1990, when I was visiting the Islamic Foundation, Markfield. But before I finished it, I had to return to Khartoum.
As life in Khartoum was so hectic and chaotic at that time, I could not resume work on this study for many years (more than seven years altogether). In 1997, I was appointed as Vice-Chancellor of Juba University, and as that was the first and only appointment I could secure under the National Salvation Government (NSG) of al-Bashier, I thought I could not afford to fail or underachieve. So I devoted all my energies to the new post and new challenge. Not only had the manuscript of the present study suffered more delay, but I was so dispirited and exhausted that I pondered giving up the whole project of finishing the book. Then my term of office as Vice-Chancellor of Juba university was terminated and I found myself jobless in Khartoum. As I was hard pressed financially, I had to look for a job outside the country. When I obtained a job as an expert in academic planning at the University of Qatar, I was too pleased to take it. That meant more delays in the writing and editing of this manuscript, which became the longest manuscript ever to remain in my hands. Every task and every achievement has a set and ordained time during which it would be completed (Wa Li Kulli Ajalin Kitāb).
Subḥānaka Allāhumma wa biḥamdika, Ash-hadu an lā ilāha illā anta. Astaghfiruka wa Atūbu ilayk! Wa uṣallī wa usallim ʿalā sayyidinā Muḥammad taslīman kathīran. Wa’l-ḥamdu lillāhi Rabbi’l-‘Ālamīn.
| 30th August 2004 | Zakaria Bashier Markfield Institute of Higher Education Markfield, Leicestershire, UK. |
1. PROLOGUE
Throughout the Makkan phase of his mission, the Prophet (peace be upon him) endured the oppression and persecution of the polytheists of Makkah, with an ever-patient forbearance. He ordered his besieged and hard-pressed Companions and followers to do the same. So, for thirteen years, their strategy was one of peaceful resistance. They argued and reasoned, they explained the theses of Islam; the promise it holds for mankind in this life and in the next. The most they allowed themselves was to engage their interlocutors in polemic; wherein they attempted to substantiate their claims, and criticize the false beliefs of the polytheists and their foolish, irrational habits of idol-worship and glorifying their ancestors.
This line of action was, in fact, prescribed by God Almighty Himself. The Prophet (peace be upon him) was not given any mandate to fight back against his persecutors at that stage. The most he could do was to permit a number of those of his followers who were exposed to the worst persecution, on account of their lack of defenders and tribal allies, to make the first minor hijrah to Abyssinia.
However, as soon as the Prophet (peace be upon him) assumed political authority in Madīnah and Islam came into statehood, that policy of passive resistance was reversed. Very soon after the Prophet (peace be upon him) settled in Madīnah, he received clear and unequivocal Qur’ānic permission to fight back and not passively endure the aggression and malpractices of the polytheists against him and his followers. This new policy is expressed in verses 39-40 of Sūrah al-Ḥajj (Pilgrimage).1
These verses ushered in a new phase in the history of Islam. They were
