Jihād in West Africa during the Age of Revolutions. Paul E. Lovejoy
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Jihād in West Africa during the Age of Revolutions - Paul E. Lovejoy страница 26
![Jihād in West Africa during the Age of Revolutions - Paul E. Lovejoy Jihād in West Africa during the Age of Revolutions - Paul E. Lovejoy](/cover_pre683651.jpg)
There are two theaters of jihād that remain to be discussed: first, the regions of the Benue River basin to the east and south of the central Hausa emirates, which were under Sokoto after the division of the caliphate in 1817, and second, the Niger River valley and the area to the west of the caliphate’s capital districts, which paid homage to Gwandu. The eastern portion included Gombe, Bauchi, and, above all in importance, Adamawa. The region was to the south of Borno and with some exceptions, especially in the Jukun area, had few centralized states and was largely devoid of a Muslim population except for itinerant merchants and wandering Fulani pastoralists. By contrast, the region under Gwandu to the west consisted of a series of small emirates, with the exception of Masina, which in any event became the independent jihād state of Hamdullahi after 1817, although it maintained diplomatic relations with Sokoto. Historically, most of this region had once been part of the Songhay Empire.
Buba Yero, leader of the Fulbe in the Gongola River valley, had already been conquering territory in what became Bauchi and Gombe even before the jihād.37 There were no centralized states in this region, and hence when the jihād was declared in 1804, he quickly pledged his allegiance. He then continued his campaign to subdue the various decentralized ethnic groups in the region and fashion a state centered on the town of Gombe in the Gongola River valley. He also issued flags of his own, most notably to Hammarwa, the head of the Fulbe who had migrated from Kiri in the Gongola valley, in 1812. Hammarwa specifically targeted the Jukun state of Kona that straddled the Benue, with its capital at Akuro. Muri was founded as the capital of the Fulbe Kiri in 1817. Hammarwa’s campaigns against the dispersed non-Muslim ethnic groups resulted in gradual expansion from Muri to the south and southwest. However, Hammarwa fell out with his overlord in Gombe, a punitive expedition was sent to Muri in 1833, and Hammarwa and his son were both executed. Thereafter, Sokoto intervened and established Muri as a separate emirate.38
Bauchi emerged as an emirate in the region east of the Jos Plateau, which, like Gombe, was an area without centralized states and whose population was almost entirely non-Muslim. In 1804 ʿUthmān dan Fodio gave a flag to one of his students, Isiyaku, who was from the area where Bauchi would emerge as an emirate, but Isiyaku apparently died before reaching Kano on his way to implement the campaign. The question of who should succeed him was referred back to the Shehu, who opted to give the leadership to Isiyaku’s student Yakubu (1753–1833), who had been with Isiyaku at Degel studying with the Shehu. Yakubu was unusual in that he was not Fulbe but came from the Gerawa, who were generally not Muslims, although Yakubu’s father and grandfather were Muslims and had been good friends of Isiyaku. Yakubu was the only person who was not Fulbe to become the head of one of the emirates; the other two leading non-Muslims, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān of Nupe and ʿAbd al-Salām of Zamfara, never attained that distinction. Yakubu raided as far as the Benue River, conquering Lafia Beriberi, the Wurkan hills, parts of the Gongola River valley, and Leri. His son Ibrāhīm succeeded him and had to face revolts of Ningi, Dass, and Duguri.
Shehu dan Fodio appointed Moddibbo Adama as the supreme leader for the region south of the Benue River, which was another region without centralized states, and in reference to his key role the emirate became known as Adamawa, although it was also known as Fombina, or the lands of the south in Fulfulde. Adama marshaled the Fulbe in this area to form military units and found towns that were then recognized as part of the emirate. In this way the Fulbe established Garoua, Maroua, Rai, Chebowa, and Gurin and later Ngaoundere, Tibati, Kontcha, and Banyo. Adama also had to navigate rivalries among the Fulbe clans that required the use of force, as in conflicts between Rai Bouba and Yola and of Tibati with Ngaoundere and Yola. Adama ruled from 1809 to 1847 and was succeeded by Lawal, who ruled from 1847 to 1872.39 As head of Adamawa, Adama was referred to as lamido, Fulfulde for “ruler,” rather than as emir.40 Adama received his flag from the Shehu in March 1809 and in 1810–11 led the campaign against Mandara and Borno, but failing to consolidate his position there, he subsequently issued over forty flags himself and by 1825–30 was responsible for founding Ngaoundere, Banyo, Kontcha, and Tignere on the Mambila Plateau. In 1841 he established his capital at Yola on the Benue River.41 Adamawa or Fombina, with an area of 100,000 square kilometers, had forty subemirates, the most important of which were Tibati, Ngaoundere, Rai-Buba, Maroua, Banyo, Garoua, and the capital at Yola.42
In contrast to the expansive extension of the jihād to the southeast of the Hausa heartland of the Sokoto Caliphate, the consolidation of the emirates to the west of Gwandu was small scale, although it nonetheless encompassed a territory along the Niger River and to the west of the Niger that was still of considerable size. Eight emirates were established west of Gwandu, mostly in the Niger River valley. Nine small emirates were established west of Gwandu, mostly in the Niger River valley, although Liptako, with its capital at Dori, was located 120 km west of the Niger River.
The Justification of Jihād
The deep concern expressed by the Sokoto leadership over the issue of slavery has prompted Humphrey Fisher to suggest that ʿUthmān dan Fodio may have been a “Muslim Wilberforce,” which is a useful comparison in attempting to provide a perhaps shocking equation of thinking over the issues of slavery. According to Fisher, “One of the major causes of the jihād which began in Hausaland in 1804 was the increasing enslavement of free Muslims,” which ʿUthmān dan Fodio and his son Muhammad Bello in particular found alarming.43 Whether or not the incidence of enslavement had increased in the years before 1804 is uncertain, although slaves from the central Bilād al-Sūdān became more common in the export ledgers of the Bight of Benin in the last third of the eighteenth century than previously, which suggests such an increase.44 Inevitably those who were enslaved included respectable Muslims who somehow had been enslaved. Whether or not Fisher’s comparison of Wilberforce and dan Fodio stands up to scrutiny is another matter, considering that Wilberforce was hardly sympathetic to conditions in Africa or that dan Fodio wanted to abolish the slave trade with Christians and had very little interest in the Atlantic world otherwise.
ʿUthmān dan Fodio explained the underlying principles of the movement in Kitāb al-farq, which were to eliminate social injustices introduced by oppressive governments, to combat bid ʿa (innovation), and to promote the full observance of Islam.45 In his Tanbīh al-ikhwān ʿalā aḥwāl al-Sūdān dan Fodio wrote, “As for the sultans [of Hausaland], they are undoubtedly unbelievers, even though they may profess the religion of Islam, because they practice polytheistic rituals and turn people away from the path of God and raise the flag of worldly kingdoms above the banner of Islam. All this is unbelief according to the consensus of opinions.”46 As the history of Fuuta Bundu, Fuuta Jalon, and Fuuta Toro demonstrates, the jihād of 1804 drew on earlier influences that covered a region from modern Dakar to Khartoum in the Nile valley. The model of Islamic rule was based on a form of government that owed inspiration to the ṣūfī brotherhood, or ṭarīqa, the Qādiriyya, and in turn inspired the Islamic states associated with the Tījāniyya after 1838 and, by the end of the century, the Mahdiyya as well. Of course, this model stands in sharp contrast to the tendency toward republicanism and constitutional monarchy that characterized the age of revolutions studied by Hobsbawm and others. Nonetheless, the revolutionary impact altered the political landscape, the basic components of society, and the economy in ways that fundamentally shaped West Africa.
The ideas that informed the jihād movement