Computational Intelligence and Healthcare Informatics. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Computational Intelligence and Healthcare Informatics - Группа авторов страница 19

Computational Intelligence and Healthcare Informatics - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

and deep learning approaches are used and are compared on the basis of error rate, accuracy, and training time [2]. Conventional models include Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) and Competitive Neural Network (CpNN) and deep learning model includes simple CNN. Deep CNN has better generalization ability than BPNN and CpNN but requires more iteration due to extraction of features at different layers.

      A pre-defined CNN for binary classification of chest radiographs which assess their ability on live customized dataset obtained from U.S. National Institutes of Health is presented in [18]. Before applying deep learning models, the dataset is separated into different categories and labeled manually with two different radiologist. Their labels are tallied and conflicting images are discarded. Normal images without any pathology were removed and 200,000 images were finally used for training purpose. Out of those images, models were trained on different number of images and performance of models noted in terms of AUC score. It is observed that modestly size images achieve better accuracy for binary classification into normal and abnormal chest radiograph. This automated image analysis will be useful in poor resource areas.

      The CheXNet deep learning algorithm is used to detect 14 pathologies in chest radio-graphs where the 121-layer DenseNet architecture is densely connected [49]. Ensemble network is generated by allowing multiple network to get trained on training set and networks which has less average prediction error are selected to become the part of ensemble network. The parameters of each ensemble network are initialized using the ImageNet pretrained network. The image input size is 512 × 512 and the optimization of Adams was used to train the NN parameter with batch size of 8 and learning rate of 0.0001. To prevent dropouts and decay, network was saved after every epoch. To deal with overfitting, early stopping of iteration was done.

      A model, namely, ChestNet, is proposed for detection of consolidation, a kind of lung opacity in pediatric CXR images [5]. Consolidation is one of the critical abnormalities whose detection helps in early prediction of pneumonia. Before applying model, three-step pre-processing is done to deal with the issues, namely, checking the presence of confounding variables in the image, searching for consolidation patterns instead of using histogram features, and learning is used to detect sharp edges such as ribs and spines instead of directly detecting pattern of consolidation by the CNN. ChestNet models consist of convolutional layers, batch normalization layers embedded after each convolutional layer, and two classifier layers at the last. Only two max-pooling layers were used in contrast to five layers of VGG16, and DenseNet121 in order to preserve the region of image where the consolidation pattern is spread out. Smaller size convolutional layer such as 3 × 3 learns undesirable features, so to avoid this author used 7 × 7 size convolutional layer to learn largely spread consolidation pattern.

      Multiple feature extraction technique was used by author in paper [23] for the classification of thoracic pathologies. Various classifiers such as Gaussian discriminant analysis (GDA), KNN, Naïve Bayes, SVM, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Random forest, and ELM were compared with pretrained DenseNet121 which was used for localization by generating CAM (Class Activation Map) and integrated results of different shallow and deep feature extraction algorithms such as Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), Gradient-based (GIST), Local Binary Pattern (LBP), and Histogram Oriented Gradient–based (HOG) with different classifiers have been used for final classification of various lung abnormalities. It is observed that ELM is having better F1-score than the DenseNet121.

      Two asymmetric networks ResNet and DenseNet which extract complementary unique features from input image were used to design new ensemble model known as DualCheXNet [10]. It has been the first attempt to use complementarity of dual asymmetric subnetworks developed in the field of thoracic disease classification. Two networks, i.e., ResNet and DenseNet are allowed to work simultaneously in Feature Level Fusion (FLF) module and selected features from both networks are combined in Decision Level fusion (DLF) on which two auxiliary classifiers are applied for classifying image into one of the pathologies.

Скачать книгу