Pathy's Principles and Practice of Geriatric Medicine. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Pathy's Principles and Practice of Geriatric Medicine - Группа авторов страница 220

Pathy's Principles and Practice of Geriatric Medicine - Группа авторов

Скачать книгу

target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="#ulink_e616f75c-445c-53ac-9343-857e4aa66c6e">* The terms fecal incontinence and anal incontinence are often used interchangeably. However, anal incontinence refers to involuntary passage of either faeces or flatus, whereas fecal incontinence refers to incontinence of stool alone.

       Katherine A. Evans1 and Charlene M. Prather2

      1 Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK

      2 Gastroenterology, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri, USA

      Constipation most classically refers to reduced defecation frequency and hard stools. Physicians typically define constipation as fewer than three bowel movements per week. Patients more frequently describe constipation as defecatory difficulty with predominant complaints of straining or hard stools. This holds particularly true in older adults. Understanding the patient’s view of constipation assists in evaluation and treatment.

      Constipation may be defined in many different ways. Simply stated, primary constipation refers to constipation without an obvious cause, and secondary constipation results from external aetiologies. These external causes of altered bowel function may include neuromuscular disorders, metabolic abnormalities, medications, insufficient diet, or mechanical factors obstructing the movement of stool. Constipation may be further defined as acute or chronic. Chronic constipation indicates that symptoms have been present for more than three months and typically dates back years. Acute constipation requires a more rapid investigation into the aetiology, including evaluation for structural abnormalities or recent medication changes. Patients with chronic constipation may initially be treated symptomatically with fibre and/or simple laxatives. Those not responding to usual treatments require further investigation to evaluate for evidence of slow‐transit constipation or dyssynergic defecation (also called pelvic outlet dysfunction). Although constipation commonly occurs in the setting of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), new‐onset IBS occurs less frequently in older patients than younger ones. Specific criteria have been defined to aid practitioners in diagnosing constipation related to IBS. The Rome IV criteria are commonly used, with the most recent iteration in 2016.1

      The Bristol stool chart can be used to objectively describe bowel habits and classify patients into the correct subtype to ensure correct diagnosis and treatment. The Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) was developed in the 1990s in the Bristol Royal Infirmary, England.2 The authors described seven types of stool:

       Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass)

       Type 2: Sausage‐shaped, but lumpy

       Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface

       Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft

       Type 5: Soft blobs with clearcut edges (passed easily)

       Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool

       Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid

Schematic illustration of illustration of the defecatory process.
Central nervous system
Awareness of need to defecate
Cerebrovascular accident
Dementia Parkinson’s disease
Peripheral nervous system
Controls myogenic activity of puborectalis
Pudendal nerve injury
Enteric nervous system
Controls rectal sensory function, peristalsis, and internal anal sphincter
Parkinson’s disease
Desensitization (chronically distended rectum)
Diabetes mellitus
Skeletal muscle
Contraction/relaxation of puborectalis and external sphincter
Direct muscular damage (e.g. prior birth trauma, sphincterotomy)
Rheumatological disorders (e.g. scleroderma, reduced muscular strength)
Incoordination
Idiopathic

      Constipation has long been misunderstood as a common problem associated with ageing. The prevalence of self‐reported constipation, physician visits, and laxative use increase with ageing.3‐5 In contrast, reported stool frequency does not change with age.3,4 Challenges in defining the prevalence of constipation in elders relates to the variety of criteria used in different studies. Self‐reported constipation affects 27% of individuals age 65 and older, whereas only 17% of elders meet more stringent (e.g. Rome criteria) diagnostic criteria for chronic constipation.6 When adjusting for race and laxative use, odds ratios for fewer than three bowel movements per week in individuals age 70–79

Скачать книгу