University of Edinburgh. He is the author of articles on Greek lyric, tragedy, comedy and Hellenistic poetry, and of monographs on Simonides and on Callimachus.
Patricia A. Rosenmeyer is George L. Paddison Professor of Classics at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, having taught previously at Michigan, Yale, and Wisconsin. She has published books in various research areas: The Politics of Imitation: Anacreon and the Anacreontic Tradition (Cambridge 1992), Ancient Epistolary Fictions: the Letter in Greek Literature (Cambridge 2001), Ancient Greek Literary Letters (Routledge 2006), and The Language of Ruins: Greek and Latin Inscriptions on the Memnon Colossus (Oxford 2018). Her interests also include the reception of Classical literature by English, French, German, and Jewish authors.
C. Michael Sampson is Associate Professor of Classics at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada. He is an editor of the Digital Corpus of Literary Papyri (https://papyri.info) and is the author of “Deconstructing the Provenances of P.Sapph.Obbink” (Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 57, 2020: 143–169).
Hannah Silverblank is a Visiting Assistant Professor in Classics at Haverford College, where she teaches courses in Greek, Latin, Comparative Literature, and Religion. She received her DPhil in 2017 from Oxford, where she wrote her dissertation on monstrous voice in ancient Greek epic, lyric, and tragedy. Her research examines nonhuman sociologies and the power-sensitivity of categories in Greek, Latin, and English literature. Her recent research focuses on occulture, disability studies, and classical reception; regarding the two latter subjects, she has recently published an article in Classical Receptions Journal with Marchella Ward entitled “Why does Classical Reception need Disability Studies?”
Henry Spelman is the Leventis Fellow in Ancient Greek at Merton College, Oxford. He is the author of Pindar and the Poetics of Permanence (Oxford University Press, 2018) and the editor of The Cambridge Companion to Pindar (forthcoming from Cambridge University Press).
Laura Swift is Senior Lecturer in Classical Studies at the Open University. She is the author of Archilochus: The Poems (2019), Greek Tragedy: Themes and Contexts (2016), The Hidden Chorus: Echoes of Genre in Tragic Lyric (2010) and Euripides: Ion (2008), as well as numerous articles on Greek tragedy and early Greek poetry. She has also worked with theatre practitioners on how to represent and stage fragmentary Greek poetry as a contemporary art form.
Marek Wecowski (M.A. Warsaw; Ph.D. Paris, with honours) is associate professor of ancient history at the University of Warsaw and member of the Academic Board of the Polish Archaeological Institute at Athens. He was a junior fellow at Harvard’s Center for Hellenic Studies and a Fulbright visiting professor at Princeton University. His research interests include archaic Greek poetry, Greek historiography, archaic and classical Greek history and Athenian democracy. His works include the book on The Rise of the Greek Aristocratic Banquet (OUP 2014). The English translation of his recent book on the original purpose of Athenian ostracism is in preparation
Andreas T. Zanker holds the position of Assistant Professor of Classics at Amherst College. He has published two monographs - Greek and Latin Expressions of Meaning: The Classical Origins of a Modern Metaphor and Metaphor in Homer: Time, Speech, and Thought - as well a volume (co-edited with Kathrin Winter and Martin Stöckinger) dedicated to the relationship between Horace and Seneca.
Preface
Recent decades have seen a resurgence of interest in Greek lyric, making it one of the most dynamic areas of Classical scholarship. The papyrological discoveries of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have transformed our knowledge of the corpus of Greek lyric, by both expanding the number of texts available, and allowing us access to a range beyond those selected for quotation in later authors. Meanwhile, new methodological approaches to ancient texts have taken the study of lyric beyond the textual and philological handling of fragments. This volume aims to reflect the current state of play in the study of Greek lyric, and showcase the scope and range of approaches to be found in scholarly work in the field. It also seeks to orient the newcomer to the range of contextual and technical information which is needed to engage with the lyric poets, and to work with texts which are mainly preserved as fragments.
The volume is divided into sections which explore Greek lyric from a variety of different perspectives. Section one situates Greek lyric in its historical and performative contexts. While performance context is an important factor in all Greek literature, the close relationship of lyric poetry with ritual, communal, and social life makes it particularly closely bound to time, location, and occasion. Section two has a two-fold purpose: first, it aims to give a clear overview of the technical issues that particularly apply to dealing with Greek lyric, and which can pose difficulties to those new to the field. These include the transmission of the corpus and how scholars work with papyri and manuscripts, the language of lyric, and the role of meter and music. Second, the section showcases some of the methodologies that characterize modern approaches to lyric poetry, and that can help us read these texts in new ways. Section three provides a detailed overview of the authors and forms that constitute Greek lyric, from our earliest texts in the seventh century BC through to classical Athens and the Hellenistic period. Finally, Section four offers insights into the rich reception history of Greek lyric. This section begins with two chapters on the crucially important Roman reception of Greek lyric, followed by other chapters on how lyric poetry has influenced and inspired writers in the modern era. The latter is not meant to be an exhaustive study (which would easily fill a Companion volume of its own), but offers rather a selection of current research into where and when lyric has inspired later authors.
The volume is intended to be accessible to those with little previous knowledge of Greek lyric, including undergraduate and Masters’ students. Some of the more technical topics by their nature pre-suppose a greater level of previous subject knowledge or linguistic ability: in particular, the chapters on dialects, meter, and papyrology are aimed at a reader with some experience of the Greek language. In the rest of the volume, no knowledge of Greek is assumed, and Greek, where included, is translated. Each chapter is followed by a short guide to further reading, to assist the reader who wishes to know what their next steps could be in learning more about the topic or author, while the bibliography at the end provides a much more extensive list of up-to-date research in the field. The list of abbreviations at the front of the volume includes the standard editions and abbreviations used by scholars working in this field.
A volume of this size owes a great deal to many. I am grateful to the contributors themselves for their hard work and wise insights, to the external readers, who made many helpful suggestions on structure and scope, and of course to those at Blackwell-Wiley who guided it through the process of publication. My editorial work was done during a period of research leave funded by the Leverhulme Trust, and I am grateful to the Trust for their generous support. Particular thanks are due to Bill Allan, for his support throughout, and for the index.
CHAPTER 1 The Lyric Chorus
Lucia Athanassaki
The chorus was a group of male, female, or male and female adults, adolescents, or children who sang and danced simultaneously in honor of the gods at periodic Panhellenic and local festivals or smaller cultic events.1 Choruses also celebrated in song and dance important moments and achievements of mortals, such as weddings, athletic victories, civic and religious appointments, and any other activity that a community or a family thought worth celebrating and/or commemorating. Even when choruses celebrated human achievements, however, gods enjoyed an equal, if not greater, share in the eulogy, because divine favor was considered a sine qua non for
