Parasitology. Alan Gunn

Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Parasitology - Alan Gunn страница 50

Автор:
Жанр:
Серия:
Издательство:
Parasitology - Alan Gunn

Скачать книгу

Infectious stage in the salivary glands 20–30 days post infection.

      Source: Redrawn from Chandler and Read (1961), © Wiley‐ Blackwell.

Photo depicts light microscope photograph of trypomastigote stages of Trypanosoma brucei.

      Genomic Regulation in Trypanosomes

      In most eukaryotic organisms, the regulatory processes that take place after the conversion of DNA into RNA are of greater complexity and importance than transcription itself. Trypanosomes take this process to its limits and undertake genome regulation almost entirely at post‐transcriptional level (Queiroz et al. 2009). The formation of proteins in trypanosomes is not regulated by the rate at which mRNA is synthesised but occurs through factors that control the stability of the mRNA molecules (i.e., alter their half‐life and hence concentration) and the rate at which mRNA is translated into protein. RNA binding proteins perform much of this posttranscriptional regulation. Rapid changes in the half‐life of mRNA molecules and translational control regulate adaptions to environmental change such as the movement between vector and mammalian host (Schwede et al. 2012).

      Once established within their vertebrate host, the trypanosomes rapidly disseminate about the body via the blood and lymphatic system. Unlike T. cruzi and Leishmania, T. brucei remains an extracellular parasite and never invades cells in its vertebrate host. However, it does invade most of the organs of the body by colonising the intercellular spaces (c.f., T. congolense that tends to remain within the circulatory system). In humans, T. brucei gambiense crosses the blood–brain barrier and colonises the intercellular spaces in the brain. In so doing, it causes the classic symptoms of HAT. By contrast, T. brucei rhodesiense does not usually colonise our nervous system although this may be at least partly because the patient dies before this happens.

      The development of HAT depends upon the species of trypanosome and its genetic strain, as well as host health and genetic factors (Kazumba et al. 2018). In the case of gambiense stage 1 HAT, a red sore develops at the site where the tsetse fly bit and over the subsequent weeks or months the patient develops a fever, their lymph glands swell, and they suffer from aches, pains, and headaches. These symptoms are non‐specific, and the disease often remains undiagnosed. In the absence of effective treatment, the disease develops remorselessly to stage 2 HAT in which the symptoms become severe with prolonged fevers, weight loss, anaemia and damage to the central nervous system.

      Following their ingestion by a tsetse fly, the parasites differentiate into procyclic trypomastigotes within the midgut region. The main stimulus for the transformation is the drop in temperature (~10 °C) that the parasites experience when they move from the warm mammalian bloodstream to the much cooler insect gut. There are also major changes in the parasite’s metabolism in response to the movement from a hot environment in which glucose is plentiful to a cooler one in which glucose is in much lower concentration. In mammals, the trypanosomes have poorly developed mitochondria since they derive their ATP from glycolysis using the abundantly available glucose obtained from their host and most of their glycolytic enzymes are located within their glycosomes. Trypanosome glycolysis within their mammalian hosts is remarkably inefficient (the metabolism of one mole of glucose yields only two moles of ATP) and the pathway ceases at pyruvate, which they excrete. By contrast, in tsetse flies the trypanosome mitochondrion is a much bigger organelle and has well‐developed cristae. This is because oxidative catabolism becomes more important as a source of ATP.

      The metacyclic trypomastigote stage is infective to susceptible mammalian hosts and expresses a specific subset of genes coding for variant surface glycoproteins (VSG). When an infected tsetse fly feeds, it injects the metacyclic trypanosomes into the blood stream and the VSG help protect them from the mammalian immune system. The trypanosome life cycle within the tsetse flies therefore involves a complex sequence of migrations and transformations and typically takes about 3–5 weeks. Consequently, effective transmission depends heavily upon the lifespan of the tsetse fly vector. Male tsetse flies usually only live for about 2–3 weeks in the wild and whilst female tsetse flies survive for up to 4 months, most die within 20–40 days.

      How Trypanosomes Alter Tsetse Fly Physiology to Facilitate Transmission

      Tstetse flies have an extremely effective immune system that usually kills any trypanosomes present within their blood meal soon after it is ingested. Nevertheless, if a tsetse fly is susceptible to infection, the ingestion of even a single trypanosome is sufficient to ensure it becomes a vector (Maudlin and Welburn 1989). Once infected, a tsetse fly remains infected for the rest of its life. Although trypanosomes grow and reproduce in tsetse flies, they do not appear to cause them much, if any, harm. However, the trypanosomes do alter the protein composition and antihaemostatic properties of tsetse fly saliva. This reduces the saliva’s capacity to prevent blood coagulation and vasoconstriction. This results in the flies spending more time probing for a blood vessel. This may either provide more time for parasite transmission to take place or encourage the tsetse fly to move more frequently between hosts. The mechanism(s) by which the parasites alter the composition of the tsetse fly saliva are uncertain, but they may trigger a stress response that decreases certain gene expressions (Van Den Abbeele et al. 2010).

      At the time of writing, five drugs had approval for the treatment of HAT: pentamidine, suramin, melarsoprol, eflornithine, and nifurtimox. Pentamidine and suramin are used to treat first‐stage HAT whilst melarsoprol (Mel B), eflornithine, and nifurtimox are used for second‐stage HAT. None of the drugs is ideal, and some have serious side effects. For example, suramin can cause anaphylactic shock and kidney failure, whilst melarsoprol can cause seizures and kills 1 in 20 of the patients who receive it. Although the risks might sound unacceptable, in the absence of treatment, there is an extremely high chance that a patient with HAT will die of the disease. Nifurtimox has the advantages of being easier to administer and less toxic than the other drugs but is prescribed as a combination therapy with eflornithine rather than on its own.

Скачать книгу