101. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
102. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
103. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
104. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
105. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
106. How does the Community Information Systems manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
107. Who is gathering Community Information Systems information?
<--- Score
108. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Community Information Systems leverage and how?
<--- Score
109. Is Community Information Systems required?
<--- Score
110. Has the Community Information Systems work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
111. How do you think the partners involved in Community Information Systems would have defined success?
<--- Score
112. Do you all define Community Information Systems in the same way?
<--- Score
113. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
114. What is the definition of Community Information Systems excellence?
<--- Score
115. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
116. How did the Community Information Systems manager receive input to the development of a Community Information Systems improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
117. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
118. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
119. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
120. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
121. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
122. What Community Information Systems requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
123. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
124. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
125. Will team members perform Community Information Systems work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
126. Have all basic functions of Community Information Systems been defined?
<--- Score
127. Is there a Community Information Systems management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
128. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
129. Who are the Community Information Systems improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
130. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
131. How do you manage unclear Community Information Systems requirements?
<--- Score
132. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
133. How do you hand over Community Information Systems context?
<--- Score
134. Is the Community Information Systems scope manageable?
<--- Score
135. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Community Information Systems Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
