Score
102. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
103. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
104. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
105. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Document processing goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
106. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
107. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Document processing?
<--- Score
108. What is the scope of the Document processing work?
<--- Score
109. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
110. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
111. How have you defined all Document processing requirements first?
<--- Score
112. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
113. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
114. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
115. Who approved the Document processing scope?
<--- Score
116. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
117. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
118. What Document processing requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
119. Is special Document processing user knowledge required?
<--- Score
120. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
121. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
122. Do you have a Document processing success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
123. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
124. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
125. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
126. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
127. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
128. Are the Document processing requirements complete?
<--- Score
129. What sources do you use to gather information for a Document processing study?
<--- Score
130. Have all basic functions of Document processing been defined?
<--- Score
131. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
132. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
133. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
134. What are the Document processing use cases?
<--- Score
135. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
136. What is the definition of Document processing excellence?
<--- Score
137. What is the context?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Document processing Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How will success or failure be measured?
<--- Score
2. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
3. What are the current
