What scope to assess?
<--- Score
12. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
13. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
14. What would be the goal or target for a Construction Estimating Software’s improvement team?
<--- Score
15. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
16. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
17. Has the Construction Estimating Software work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
18. What is the scope of the Construction Estimating Software work?
<--- Score
19. Have all basic functions of Construction Estimating Software been defined?
<--- Score
20. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
21. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
22. What are the core elements of the Construction Estimating Software business case?
<--- Score
23. How do you manage unclear Construction Estimating Software requirements?
<--- Score
24. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
25. Will team members perform Construction Estimating Software work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
26. What sources do you use to gather information for a Construction Estimating Software study?
<--- Score
27. What is the scope of Construction Estimating Software?
<--- Score
28. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Construction Estimating Software results are met?
<--- Score
29. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Construction Estimating Software work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
30. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
31. How do you catch Construction Estimating Software definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
32. Is there any additional Construction Estimating Software definition of success?
<--- Score
33. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
34. Do you all define Construction Estimating Software in the same way?
<--- Score
35. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Construction Estimating Software changes?
<--- Score
36. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
37. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
38. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
39. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
40. Is Construction Estimating Software currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
41. What Construction Estimating Software services do you require?
<--- Score
42. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
43. Is the Construction Estimating Software scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
44. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Construction Estimating Software?
<--- Score
45. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
46. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
47. What is the scope of the Construction Estimating Software effort?
<--- Score
48. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
49. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
50. What system do you use for gathering Construction Estimating Software information?
<--- Score
51. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
52. Will team members regularly document their Construction Estimating Software work?
<--- Score
53.
