style="font-size:15px;"> См.: Tichenor Veronica Jaris. EarningMore and Getting Less: Why Successful Wives Can't Buy Equality. New Brunswick. NJ: Rutgers University Press. 2005
16
Эверстова К.Н. Перспективы сокращения разницы между заработными платами мужчин и женщин в российской федерации URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2012/12/18952 (дата обращения: 5.01.2015)
17
Данные исследования, проведенные фондом WageIndicator. URL: http://www.mojazarplata.ru/main/zarabotok/karta-mira-gendernye-razlichija-v-oplate-truda (дата обращения 1.01.2015)
18
* Источники: Eurostat, OECD
** Рейтинг основан на сочетании следующих факторов: Экономическое участие и возможности, Уровень образования, Здоровье и образ жизни, Политические права и возможности. Данные показывают относительное благополучие женщин в конкретно взятой стране. Индекс 1 означает, что благополучие женщин в данной стране лучше, чем в любой другой.
Источник: Данные исследования, проведенные фондом WageIndicator. URL: http://www.mojazarplata.ru/main/zarabotok/karta-mira-gendernye-razlichija-v-oplate-truda (дата обращения 1.01.2015)
19
См.: Gimcnez, M. “Marxism and class, gender, and race: Rethinking the trilogy,” Race, Gender & Class, 8(2) 2001, pp. 23–33. Lareau. A. Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2004. См. так же: Ferdman, В. The color and culture of gender in organizations: Attending to race and ethnicity,” in The Handbook of Gender and Work, ed. G. Powell. Thousand Oaks, CA, 1999
20
Гендерная асимметрия – непропорциональная представленность социальных и культурных ролей обоих полов (а также представлений о них) в различных сферах жизни. Источник: Гендерная ассиметрия//Словарь гендерных терминов. URL: http://www.owl.ru/gender/016.htm (дата обращения: 5.01.2015) См. также: Айвазова С. Г. Русские женщины в лабиринте равноправия. М.: ЗАО "Редакционно-издательский комплекс Русанова", 1988.
21
Sherry Beth Ortner. Theory in Anthropology Since the Sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26(1), 1984 pp. 126–166; Sherry Beth Ortner. Making Gender: The Politics and Erotics of Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.1996
22
Blumer, Herbert.. Symbolic lnteractionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1969
23
Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks. Calif.: Sage. Anderson. Nels. 1923; Deutscher, Irwin & Linda Lindsey. Preventing Ethnic Conflict: Successful Cross-. National Strategies. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2005, p.5
24
Fenstermaker, S. and West, C. Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power and Institutional Change. Nueva York: Routledge, 2, 2002
25
См.: Goffman, Èrving. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press. 1963.
26
Kim Janna L., C. Lynn Sorsoli et al. From sex to sexuality: Exposing the heterosexual script on prime time network television.” Journal of Sex Research 44(2), 2007, pp. 145-57.
27
Walzer, Susan. Redoing gender through divorce. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 25(1), 2008, pp. 5-21.
28
Smith, Dorothy. 'Theorising as ideology", in Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974, pp. 41 -4; Smith, Dorothy. 'Women's perspective as a radical critique of Sociology", Sociological Quarterly, 44: 1974, 7-13. Smith, Dorothy. ‘A peculiar eclipsing: women’s exclusion from men’s culture'. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 1, 1978; Smith, Dorothy. The Everyday World As Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Buckingham: Open University Press. 1987; Smith, Dorothy. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston. MA: Northeastern University Press. 1990; Smith, Dorothy. Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: Routledge. 1990; Chafeiz, J. S. Sex and advantage. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld. 1984; Chafetz. J. S. Gender equity. Newbury Parte, CA: Sagc. 1990; Chafctz, J. S., & Dworkin. G. Female revolt. Totowa. NJ: Rowman & Allanheld. 1986
29
Brod, Harry. Scholarly studies on men: The new field is an essential complement to women’s studies. In Estelle Disch (ed.), Reconstructing Gender: A Multicultural Anthology, New York: McGraw-Hill. 2003
30
Worell J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of women and gender: Sex similarities and differences and the impact ofsociety on gender Vol. 1. San Diego. CA: Academic Press. 1996 P. 360; Worell, J. Opening doors to feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20. 1996 pp. 469–485; Worell, J.. Chandler, R. Personal Progress Scale. Unpublished manuscript. University of Kentucky. Lexington, 1996. См. так же: Worell, J. Sex roles and psychological well-being: Perspectives on methodology. and Clinical Psychology. 46, 1978 pp. 777–791. Worell, J.. Gender in close relationships: Public policy vs. personal prerogative. Journal of Social Issues. 49(3), 1993, 203–218. Worell, J. Feminist interventions: Life beyond symptom reduction. Psychology of Womrn Quarterly, 24. 2000; Worell, J.. Etaugh, C. Transforming theory and research with women: Themes and variations. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 18, 1994, pp. 433–450. Worell, J.. Stiliseli, D., Robinson, D., Oakley, D. Educating about women and gender: Cognitive, personal. and professional outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23. 1999
31
