they become Nazis, quite naturally.
And in Russia.
If there are only two important megacities in the state, and the population remains almost traditional, then this is the time of younger sons who are hungry for justice.
CHAPTER VII
COMMUNIST THALMANN IN THE ROLE OF IVAN THE FOOL
So, in order to the ideas of the people’s state to be at the top or dominating, it is necessary to have a certain number of conditional older brothers. Younger brothers get the upper hand when this absolute authority is not present. All the old city elite, all these doctors, teachers, lawyers and officials are once again turning into supporters of a hard hand, authoritarianism, do not recognize any tramps from the street, no proletarians with their equalization and social justice fake. Everything that these ragamuffins shouted under the direction of their leaders, all these slogans painted on marching banners, all this was a lie, hypocrisy from the point of view of the urban elite. The traditional perception of caste has not disappeared anywhere. It took a slightly different form. All civil servants and intellectuals turn into conservatives at once. But not in the form of those retrogrades that want to return the feudal castes, no one has yet gone mad to reverse the history of the Revival of feudalism with its rigid castes is possible only with little urbanization at all. Only for nomads is possible. For urbanized peoples, such a revival of history is de facto impossible. The past elite in the form of remids wants to stop this farce of legal equality, even at the cost of curtailing their rights. After all, the Republic is always a Horde of all the younger brothers. It was their democracy, their endless chatter, their permissiveness that led to the crisis. In fact, they violated the law of social hierarchy and led to anarchy. If it is not the elder brother who rules, or even the father, but the younger ones who want authority, this will inevitably lead any family to ruin. If you gather the will of all the younger ones in the Republican Parliament, you will get a violation of tradition within the entire society. This is how all the old intelligentsia turns into supporters of autocracy, dictatorship, and then Nazism, if there is a need to unite everyone with one idea from teachers to lumpmen.
But wait, because in Germany in the 30s, the Communist party also marched cheerfully on squares and streets. In the ranks of the KPD and under the hand of the Communist leader, Telman were a million workers. How did they differ from the Republican younger brothers? Why were they for an even more left-wing social Republic? At least in words in their slogans of the dictatorship of the proletariat.
Everyone who stands for the Republic is a younger brother by definition. It is inferior to others in Patriarchal law. In turn, the one who is inferior in age to all the brothers is a Communist. There are no real brothers in revkon. There are brothers in reflection. Proletarians are the young of the townspeople. They are zeremids. Why did they not join the ranks of the bourgeois and petty-bourgeois Democrats? Вecause all the places in the market and especially in the parliament were occupied when they arrived. The burghers have already filled the city. The only places left for survival are in factories.
Now, the younger brother is not only due to age, but also the practice of life is obliged to get a family by the deadline. He will have children. He becomes a father too. Now he is not even an older brother, but a father, which is even worse for the Republic. Each time he will rule and take the side of all the older brothers and the existing elite. Right or wrong?
The fact is that every father is the founder of a dynasty, and therefore of a family tradition. Whose footsteps will his son follow? Even if it goes to the same factory.
Of course, the Germans under more favorable circumstances could prevail not Bolshevism, but Nazism. That is, the Institute of Junior Republicans of the proletarian type. In this case, the German service elite would have changed its Nazi orientation and become entirely international? Quite possible. For all remids, the state comes first. Let it be not German, but international German – what difference does it make? It does not matter which leader would curb the market bacchanalia.
But Stalin himself would not have needed an advanced Soviet Germany. Stalin needed a German leader-the younger brother and puppet, the sexless leader Telman. Telman must fulfill the will of another form of seniority – the Communist Moscow regime, which by this time was a continuation of the Russian feudal tradition. Stalin’s officials and nomenclature were only called Bolsheviks. The real Bolsheviks, world internationalists, were not yet killed by Stalin de facto, but removed from power. He leaned on his «sons» looking into his mouth, also almost ideologically sexless, but willing to start a family. All according to the same laws of tradition. A quiet heifer sucks the two cows. In the Russian tradition, you don’t have to be the oldest to get an inheritance. In the Russian tradition, obedience itself promised not only pies, but also the love of parents. Any poor Ivan is a fool or Emelya on the stove are not just a folk heroes.
CHAPTER VIII
REMIDS STATESMEN
Well, why did the German statists, supporters of the state still choose Hitler but not Telman? Although Telman was already placed in the category of second-rate German deputies of Stalin. In the years 27—29, Stalin purged Lenin’s third Comintern from leftists. Left people similar to themselves, to their conditional family, because the similarity of brothers is not necessarily external similarity. But it was not the figure and size of Telman’s personality that played a major role in the Germans ' strategic choice.
So, the Germans, unlike the Russians in 1917, preferred the right-wing statists-the Nazis. Although the success of the Russian zerefs was before the eyes of the whole world. And the German Communist party was not a small one. And where else did Marx’s teaching receive the approval of peoples and development? We will say immediately in pursuit of the reason for the choice of the German people. Everyone knows that the dictatorship of the proletariat in various forms of its understanding and interpretation took root only in underdeveloped agricultural countries, and to be more precise – in Asia. In the same Asia, where the word despotism was more consonant with dictate. But why?
From the history of the development of all social systems in the world (and from Engels) we know that the state can be where there is property. Where there was no property and no one could confirm their capabilities, there was the dictate of the most important owner and his vassals.
Even the comparison and evidence of the backwardness of the future Communist communities does not clarify the specifics. Yes, more technically underdeveloped. Yes, the culture has more emotions and a tilt towards mythology. Rational peoples do not believe in fairy tales at all. And traditional ones avoid rationality. Rational and meticulous Marxism appealed to the traditional peoples not by its content, but by its completion. Where at the end of the Marxist teaching good overcomes evil, there was a coincidence of myth and Marxism, they met without logic for love.
But did the Germans abandon the tradition?
No, the Germans did not abandon the tradition. They remained loyal to their German state. Do you think that in the rational cold world of property and money the ancient castes were abandoned? No way. The teaching of the revkon says from the very beginning: the traditional (zeref) world has no semitones. The world of citizenship, the market, and money has many such halftones. They are like rubber shock absorbers, spacers between strata, cellophane with bubbles-they soften the relationship of superiority and humiliation. In the bourgeois world it is not clear who is the master and who is his servant. Outside, everyone is walking the same way. Only very fine details are
