meeting by both sides. The meeting had similar long statements punctuated this time for distrust. In this a way the Russians to first see what the Germans offered before committing to giving something in return and have time for response formulation to allow bargaining. The resultant format in the end is like that used by world leaders “for language reasons” in their meetings).
I hope you are well; I feel extremely uneasy with the current US president, we have heard that many in the white house believe that he is a despot surrounded by sycophants and capable of any act. He is planning to keep the Syrian Oil that says he is ‘helping to defend and stop Syrian regime forces taking control of ‘with troops at Oil installations in Syria. America is allowing the Oil to be sold and America is keeping the profits ‘temporarily to stop it falling into the current regime’s hands’, his real plan is to keep the Oil and profits permanently, which is the crime of looting in effect and against international Law.
There is already a plan in place to attack Iran and eventually recolonizing Iraq to cut off the old Silk Road route needed for the Belt and Road Initiative that the Chinese are currently busy making, which would give China good access to Europe and Africa. I do believe according to my sources that America is getting remarkably close to enacting this plan because the President sees it, as a way to win the next general election as well as a huge land and resource grab.
I would think it to be a good idea to mention this to the Russian President in order that he can either dissuade the Americans or do it himself first.
The Russians would be far better to be able to clean up the mess afterwards and restore order but also to ensure the limiting of terrorism which would be an eventual fallout. If one looks at what the Americans have done to Iraq you can see what the future could bring with them occupying it officially, I think it would be a disaster. After all I think it would be a very good time for the Russian President to talk to the American President, because being so close to the elections he would not dare any of the real truth of how he was elected or what help he had; to come out. I think this would be an ideal time to use that bargaining chip if it is required. After all the American President, shouts his mouth off but can be made to back off with real threats, as we have seen that from North Korea, China and from various other debacles. He has no honour or integrity and not great intelligence so I’m sure that the Russian President will be able to guide him without too much trouble as others, not least the ones I’ve already mentioned, have done so in the past.
This information was all obtained from a source we have had for the last 20 years in the Pentagon. He gives us a weekly briefing and is exceptionally reliable so you can be assured this information is accurate. What do you have for me my friend?
Trotsky (East German now in Russia ex East German intelligence officer)
Well I was informed by the presidential advisor that our security services must be ready to track and trace all Chinese entering Russia and to ensure that we check their temperature on arrival without making a public scene of it. He has stated that there is a new virus that is stronger than the usual flu called COVID-19 and it’s spreading from China. He has said that we must minimise the contact of the Chinese with Russian people so that we can easily understand the source of any infections and we will quietly put people into confinement if we find them to be in anyway ill on arrival. This is an extremely serious measure and therefore indicates the level of the threat perceived by us.
There have been talks between China and Russia. Mainly one must understand that the only way to stop this COVID-19 now is to stop people contracting it, until such time as a viral drug and vaccine can be made. This means that people either will be confined or at least distanced to avoid contracting it for a severe period of time as we do not know how long the drugs will take to produce, but it will be months at least.
You may wish to ask China for some useful medicines as they have developed the use of existing drugs and possibly new ones that really lower the death rate, which ones is not known in the West and China cannot “discover” that yet as the virus has not been officially known long enough to make it possible to have discovered that – clear?
Ok until the next meet, that we will not have, like we did not have this one - goodbye.
Because of this intelligence Germany knew to take the threat much more seriously and reacted with many less proven cases of the virus than others. Even more remarkable because of the much larger population Germany has than most other European countries. (perhaps also an effect of the visa for entry to Germany from China being limited secretly by China, starting in November the previous year). Germany started lockdown preparations on the 10th March. The German death rate remained consistently much lower than all the other European countries per number of cases and total deaths per thousand of their population. The German number of deaths per thousand population was strikingly like China’s, rather than the rest of Europe’s, strange considering the geographical position of Germany don’t you think reader?
In Italy, a nationwide lockdown went into effect starting on March 10 and their lockdown stopped all large group activities and confined people to home with travel effectively suspended. Spain became the second country in Europe to impose a nationwide lockdown but there was complete lack of information and planning in both countries with many infringements and failures. France closed non-essential businesses on March 16 implementing a full lockdown. On March 27 Ireland went into lockdown banning public gatherings and walks outside. Consequently, they were all still in effect having only very recently started when China was re-opening.
The main problems were that none of the countries had a clear view of what would be the most effective way to limit the viral spread, this was because they did not have various critical knowledge. Everyone was looking for answers such as what the transmission methods were, or how long the COVID-19 could stay active when outside of a body, how it was affected by climate or other factors, what could kill it and what not. Adding to the difficulty was the fact that everyone was painfully aware developing a vaccine for a new COVID-19 would take probably one and a half years (at the very best one must bear in mind that the aids has not been overcome with a vaccine in 40 years so there is no certainty that a vaccine can ever be found.) At the time there were no drug therapies that the West could find that appeared effective.
At this point world leaders descended to an “any man for himself” modus operandi, with only one or two exceptions. They tried to cover their backs by ordering lockdowns but trying to make them not too upsetting for the public by randomly banning certain activities but not others that they knew the public would take badly to being banned. The so-called scientific community did much the same wildly projecting statistics for events that they did not have reliable input for. One great miscalculation was when the virus had entered each country. All the Western countries (except Germany) were calculating one or two months late, meaning that the number of people infected already was far greater than those that were used for the statistical calculations.
The number of infections were calculated from an assumed infection rate from a starting point of the first known infection in the country in question. Each having its own start date and place that the first infected individual was assumed to have arrived. If the first infected person for the country in question, was two months earlier than that used in the calculations, then the number of people infected when the calculations were made, was far higher than the result of the calculation. The calculations were the only way to estimate the number of infections, as there was no capability to test enough people for the COVID-19 to make an actual estimate. The incorrect starting point for the number of people infected, meant that there were many more people infected than the calculation gave. An apparently much higher death rate per 1,000 people infected was calculated as a result and as the deaths were visible but the number of virus cases in the population causing them was not. Fear confusion and all sorts of wild actions in the populations and their Leaders resulted.
A further twist began to emerge when leaders realised that if they made the COVID-19 seem even worse than
