justification user knowledge required?
<--- Score
11. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
12. What would be the goal or target for a System justification’s improvement team?
<--- Score
13. What are the core elements of the System justification business case?
<--- Score
14. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
15. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
16. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
17. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
18. Has the direction changed at all during the course of System justification? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
19. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
20. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
21. How will the System justification team and the group measure complete success of System justification?
<--- Score
22. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
23. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
24. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
25. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
26. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that System justification brings?
<--- Score
27. Who are the System justification improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
28. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
29. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
30. How would you define System justification leadership?
<--- Score
31. Do you all define System justification in the same way?
<--- Score
32. How do you manage unclear System justification requirements?
<--- Score
33. How have you defined all System justification requirements first?
<--- Score
34. What are (control) requirements for System justification Information?
<--- Score
35. Is System justification required?
<--- Score
36. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
37. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
38. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected System justification results are met?
<--- Score
39. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
40. Are the System justification requirements complete?
<--- Score
41. What system do you use for gathering System justification information?
<--- Score
42. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
43. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
44. What sources do you use to gather information for a System justification study?
<--- Score
45. How do you manage changes in System justification requirements?
<--- Score
46. What is the scope of the System justification work?
<--- Score
47. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
48. How are consistent System justification definitions important?
<--- Score
49. What is the scope of System justification?
<--- Score
50. Is there a critical path to deliver System justification results?
<--- Score
51. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
52. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
53. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
