‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
56. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
57. Is Health technology assessment required?
<--- Score
58. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
59. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
60. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
61. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
62. Is there a Health technology assessment management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
63. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
64. Why are you doing Health technology assessment and what is the scope?
<--- Score
65. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
66. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
67. What are the Health technology assessment tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
68. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
69. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
70. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
71. When is/was the Health technology assessment start date?
<--- Score
72. What is the scope of the Health technology assessment work?
<--- Score
73. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
74. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Health technology assessment changes?
<--- Score
75. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Health technology assessment results are met?
<--- Score
76. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
77. How did the Health technology assessment manager receive input to the development of a Health technology assessment improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
78. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
79. What is the context?
<--- Score
80. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
81. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
82. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
83. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
84. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
85. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
86. How do you manage unclear Health technology assessment requirements?
<--- Score
87. What system do you use for gathering Health technology assessment information?
<--- Score
88. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
89. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Health technology assessment leverage and how?
<--- Score
90. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
91. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
92. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
93. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
94. What is the definition of Health technology assessment excellence?
<--- Score
95. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
96. How are consistent Health technology assessment definitions important?
<--- Score
97.
