Communications Service207
2.35 Risk Data Sheet: Wireless Communications Service209
2.36 Procurement Management Plan: Wireless Communications Service211
2.37 Source Selection Criteria: Wireless Communications Service213
2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Wireless Communications Service215
2.39 Change Management Plan: Wireless Communications Service217
3.0 Executing Process Group: Wireless Communications Service219
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Wireless Communications Service221
3.2 Change Request: Wireless Communications Service223
3.3 Change Log: Wireless Communications Service225
3.4 Decision Log: Wireless Communications Service227
3.5 Quality Audit: Wireless Communications Service229
3.6 Team Directory: Wireless Communications Service232
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Wireless Communications Service234
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Wireless Communications Service236
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Wireless Communications Service238
3.10 Issue Log: Wireless Communications Service240
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Wireless Communications Service242
4.1 Project Performance Report: Wireless Communications Service244
4.2 Variance Analysis: Wireless Communications Service246
4.3 Earned Value Status: Wireless Communications Service248
4.4 Risk Audit: Wireless Communications Service250
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Wireless Communications Service252
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Wireless Communications Service254
5.0 Closing Process Group: Wireless Communications Service256
5.1 Procurement Audit: Wireless Communications Service258
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Wireless Communications Service261
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Wireless Communications Service263
5.4 Lessons Learned: Wireless Communications Service265
Index267
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
2. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
3. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
4. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
5. Who should resolve the Wireless Communications Service issues?
<--- Score
6. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
7. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Wireless Communications Service as an effective investment?
<--- Score
8. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Wireless Communications Service will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
9. Who needs what information?
<--- Score
10. How do you recognize an Wireless Communications Service objection?
<--- Score
11. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
12. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Wireless Communications Service leader?
<--- Score
13. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
14. What situation(s) led to this Wireless Communications Service Self Assessment?
<--- Score
15. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
16. Who needs budgets?
<--- Score
17. What needs to stay?
<--- Score
18. Have you identified your Wireless Communications Service key performance indicators?
<--- Score
19. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Wireless Communications Service? In other words, what are the risks, if Wireless Communications Service does not deliver successfully?
<--- Score
20. Will Wireless Communications Service deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
21. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
22. Consider your own Wireless Communications Service project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
23. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<---
