Score
60. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
61. What is the scope of Product packaging?
<--- Score
62. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
63. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
64. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
65. What are the core elements of the Product packaging business case?
<--- Score
66. How do you catch Product packaging definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
67. What sources do you use to gather information for a Product packaging study?
<--- Score
68. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
69. Are accountability and ownership for Product packaging clearly defined?
<--- Score
70. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
71. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
72. Is special Product packaging user knowledge required?
<--- Score
73. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
74. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
75. Is Product packaging linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
76. What system do you use for gathering Product packaging information?
<--- Score
77. What would be the goal or target for a Product packaging’s improvement team?
<--- Score
78. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
79. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
80. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
81. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
82. Is there a Product packaging management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
83. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
84. Have all basic functions of Product packaging been defined?
<--- Score
85. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
86. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
87. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
88. What is the definition of Product packaging excellence?
<--- Score
89. Do you have a Product packaging success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
90. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
91. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Product packaging goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
92. Has the Product packaging work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
93. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
94. What are the Product packaging use cases?
<--- Score
95. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
96. What Product packaging requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
97. Why are you doing Product packaging and what is the scope?
<--- Score
98. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
99. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Product packaging work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
100. How do you manage changes in Product packaging requirements?
<--- Score
101. How would you define Product packaging leadership?
<--- Score
102. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<---
