Executing Process Group: Collaborative Tools214
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Collaborative Tools216
3.2 Change Request: Collaborative Tools218
3.3 Change Log: Collaborative Tools220
3.4 Decision Log: Collaborative Tools222
3.5 Quality Audit: Collaborative Tools224
3.6 Team Directory: Collaborative Tools226
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Collaborative Tools228
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Collaborative Tools230
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Collaborative Tools232
3.10 Issue Log: Collaborative Tools234
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Collaborative Tools236
4.1 Project Performance Report: Collaborative Tools238
4.2 Variance Analysis: Collaborative Tools240
4.3 Earned Value Status: Collaborative Tools242
4.4 Risk Audit: Collaborative Tools244
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Collaborative Tools246
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Collaborative Tools248
5.0 Closing Process Group: Collaborative Tools250
5.1 Procurement Audit: Collaborative Tools252
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Collaborative Tools255
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Collaborative Tools257
5.4 Lessons Learned: Collaborative Tools259
Index261
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What Collaborative tools capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
2. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
3. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
4. What Collaborative tools coordination do you need?
<--- Score
5. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Collaborative tools project?
<--- Score
6. Who should resolve the Collaborative tools issues?
<--- Score
7. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
8. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?
<--- Score
9. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
10. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Collaborative tools leader?
<--- Score
11. How are the Collaborative tools’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
12. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
13. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
14. Did you miss any major Collaborative tools issues?
<--- Score
15. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Collaborative tools as an effective investment?
<--- Score
16. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
17. What Collaborative tools problem should be solved?
<--- Score
18. What is the problem and/or vulnerability?
<--- Score
19. What else needs to be measured?
<--- Score
20. Have you identified your Collaborative tools key performance indicators?
<--- Score
21. Do you need different information or graphics?
<--- Score
22. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
23. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Collaborative tools delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
24. Consider your own Collaborative tools project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?
<--- Score
25. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
26. What resources or support might you need?
<--- Score
27. Will Collaborative tools deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
28. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
29.
