Stakeholder Management Plan: Power System Simulation216
2.39 Change Management Plan: Power System Simulation218
3.0 Executing Process Group: Power System Simulation220
3.1 Team Member Status Report: Power System Simulation222
3.2 Change Request: Power System Simulation224
3.3 Change Log: Power System Simulation226
3.4 Decision Log: Power System Simulation228
3.5 Quality Audit: Power System Simulation230
3.6 Team Directory: Power System Simulation233
3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Power System Simulation235
3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Power System Simulation237
3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Power System Simulation239
3.10 Issue Log: Power System Simulation241
4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Power System Simulation243
4.1 Project Performance Report: Power System Simulation245
4.2 Variance Analysis: Power System Simulation247
4.3 Earned Value Status: Power System Simulation249
4.4 Risk Audit: Power System Simulation251
4.5 Contractor Status Report: Power System Simulation253
4.6 Formal Acceptance: Power System Simulation255
5.0 Closing Process Group: Power System Simulation257
5.1 Procurement Audit: Power System Simulation259
5.2 Contract Close-Out: Power System Simulation261
5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Power System Simulation263
5.4 Lessons Learned: Power System Simulation265
Index267
CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE
INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
2. How many trainings, in total, are needed?
<--- Score
3. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Power system simulation research related to market response and models?
<--- Score
4. Does Power system simulation create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
5. Who should resolve the Power system simulation issues?
<--- Score
6. Do you know what you need to know about Power system simulation?
<--- Score
7. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?
<--- Score
8. Which information does the Power system simulation business case need to include?
<--- Score
9. Where is training needed?
<--- Score
10. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
11. What is the extent or complexity of the Power system simulation problem?
<--- Score
12. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Power system simulation will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
13. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?
<--- Score
14. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
15. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Power system simulation leader?
<--- Score
16. Will Power system simulation deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
17. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
18. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
19. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Power system simulation delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
20. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
21. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?
<--- Score
22. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
23. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?
<--- Score
24. What activities does the governance board need to consider?
<--- Score
25. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?
<--- Score
26. Are there Power system simulation problems defined?
<---
