is the scope of the Power system simulation effort?
<--- Score
12. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
13. What is in scope?
<--- Score
14. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
15. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
16. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
17. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
18. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
19. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
20. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
21. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
22. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
23. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Power system simulation goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
24. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
25. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
26. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Power system simulation brings?
<--- Score
27. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
28. Are accountability and ownership for Power system simulation clearly defined?
<--- Score
29. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
30. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
31. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
32. How do you hand over Power system simulation context?
<--- Score
33. Will a Power system simulation production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
34. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
35. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
36. Why are you doing Power system simulation and what is the scope?
<--- Score
37. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
38. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
39. Will team members perform Power system simulation work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
40. How would you define Power system simulation leadership?
<--- Score
41. How does the Power system simulation manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
42. Is the Power system simulation scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
43. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Power system simulation leverage and how?
<--- Score
44. Are the Power system simulation requirements testable?
<--- Score
45. How can the value of Power system simulation be defined?
<--- Score
46. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
47. How have you defined all Power system simulation requirements first?
<--- Score
48. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
49. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
50. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
51. Have all basic functions of Power system simulation been defined?
<--- Score
52. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
53. What system do you use for gathering Power system simulation information?
<--- Score
54. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired
