Score
16. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
17. What are the Source coding tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
18. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
19. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
20. Is there any additional Source coding definition of success?
<--- Score
21. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
22. What was the context?
<--- Score
23. Has a Source coding requirement not been met?
<--- Score
24. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
25. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
26. Have all basic functions of Source coding been defined?
<--- Score
27. How do you catch Source coding definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
28. What happens if Source coding’s scope changes?
<--- Score
29. What would be the goal or target for a Source coding’s improvement team?
<--- Score
30. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Source coding work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
31. Is the scope of Source coding defined?
<--- Score
32. Is the Source coding scope manageable?
<--- Score
33. Is the Source coding scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
34. What are the record-keeping requirements of Source coding activities?
<--- Score
35. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
36. How can the value of Source coding be defined?
<--- Score
37. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
38. Has the Source coding work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
39. When is/was the Source coding start date?
<--- Score
40. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Source coding goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
41. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
42. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
43. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
44. What are the core elements of the Source coding business case?
<--- Score
45. What is the scope?
<--- Score
46. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
47. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
48. How do you manage unclear Source coding requirements?
<--- Score
49. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
50. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
51. Is Source coding required?
<--- Score
52. Who is gathering Source coding information?
<--- Score
53. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
54. What is the scope of the Source coding work?
<--- Score
55. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
56. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
57. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Source coding leverage and how?
<--- Score
58. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
59. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
60. How do you think the partners involved in
