<--- Score
110. Have all basic functions of Carbon project been defined?
<--- Score
111. Who are the Carbon project improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
112. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
113. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
114. Has the Carbon project work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
116. Is there a critical path to deliver Carbon project results?
<--- Score
117. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
118. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
119. What system do you use for gathering Carbon project information?
<--- Score
120. What Carbon project requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
121. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
122. What are the Carbon project tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
123. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
124. Is Carbon project currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
125. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
126. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
127. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
128. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Carbon project? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
129. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
130. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Carbon project Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
2. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
3. What are hidden Carbon project quality costs?
<--- Score
4. Have you included everything in your Carbon project cost models?
<--- Score
5. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
6. What are the Carbon project key cost drivers?
<--- Score
7. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
8. When should you bother with diagrams?
<--- Score
9. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
10. How can a Carbon project test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
11. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?
<--- Score
12. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Carbon project services/products?
<--- Score
13. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
14. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
15. Is the cost worth the Carbon project effort ?
<--- Score
16. How can you measure Carbon project in a systematic way?
<--- Score
17. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
18. Does the Carbon project task fit the client’s priorities?
<---
