Score
13. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
14. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Construction robots goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
15. Is there a clear Construction robots case definition?
<--- Score
16. Are the Construction robots requirements testable?
<--- Score
17. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
18. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
19. Is the Construction robots scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
20. How do you manage unclear Construction robots requirements?
<--- Score
21. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
22. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
23. What are the Construction robots tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
24. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
25. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
26. How can the value of Construction robots be defined?
<--- Score
27. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
28. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
29. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
30. Has the Construction robots work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
31. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
32. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
33. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
34. Have all basic functions of Construction robots been defined?
<--- Score
35. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
36. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
37. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
38. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
39. What system do you use for gathering Construction robots information?
<--- Score
40. Are accountability and ownership for Construction robots clearly defined?
<--- Score
41. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
42. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
43. Is the scope of Construction robots defined?
<--- Score
44. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Construction robots changes?
<--- Score
45. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
46. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Construction robots work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
47. How have you defined all Construction robots requirements first?
<--- Score
48. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
49. Is the Construction robots scope manageable?
<--- Score
50. How do you gather Construction robots requirements?
<--- Score
51. Will a Construction robots production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
52. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
53. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
54. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
55. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Construction robots?
<--- Score
56.
