Who approved the Scientific workflow management system scope?
<--- Score
47. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
48. What is the context?
<--- Score
49. How do you think the partners involved in Scientific workflow management system would have defined success?
<--- Score
50. What are (control) requirements for Scientific workflow management system Information?
<--- Score
51. What gets examined?
<--- Score
52. How will the Scientific workflow management system team and the group measure complete success of Scientific workflow management system?
<--- Score
53. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
54. Have all basic functions of Scientific workflow management system been defined?
<--- Score
55. What is the scope of the Scientific workflow management system effort?
<--- Score
56. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Scientific workflow management system?
<--- Score
57. Do you all define Scientific workflow management system in the same way?
<--- Score
58. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
59. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
60. Is there a clear Scientific workflow management system case definition?
<--- Score
61. Who is gathering Scientific workflow management system information?
<--- Score
62. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
63. How do you manage changes in Scientific workflow management system requirements?
<--- Score
64. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
65. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
66. What is the scope of the Scientific workflow management system work?
<--- Score
67. How do you gather Scientific workflow management system requirements?
<--- Score
68. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
69. How did the Scientific workflow management system manager receive input to the development of a Scientific workflow management system improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
70. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
71. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
72. Will a Scientific workflow management system production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
73. Is Scientific workflow management system linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
74. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
75. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
76. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
77. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
78. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
79. How do you catch Scientific workflow management system definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
80. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
81. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
82. Who are the Scientific workflow management system improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
83. What are the record-keeping requirements of Scientific workflow management system activities?
<--- Score
84. How have you defined all Scientific workflow management system requirements first?
<--- Score
85. What would be the goal or target for a Scientific workflow management system’s improvement team?
<--- Score
86. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
87. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
88. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Scientific workflow management system? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
89.
