Medical History A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.
Читать онлайн книгу Medical History A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 7
60. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
61. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
62. Is there a clear Medical history case definition?
<--- Score
63. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
64. Has the Medical history work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
65. What are the Medical history use cases?
<--- Score
66. Is there a Medical history management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
67. Who approved the Medical history scope?
<--- Score
68. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
69. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
70. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
71. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
72. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
73. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
74. What Medical history services do you require?
<--- Score
75. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
76. How would you define Medical history leadership?
<--- Score
77. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
78. Why are you doing Medical history and what is the scope?
<--- Score
79. Do you have a Medical history success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
80. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
81. What was the context?
<--- Score
82. Have all basic functions of Medical history been defined?
<--- Score
83. Who are the Medical history improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
84. How did the Medical history manager receive input to the development of a Medical history improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
85. What is the scope of the Medical history work?
<--- Score
86. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
87. Has a Medical history requirement not been met?
<--- Score
88. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
89. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
90. Is special Medical history user knowledge required?
<--- Score
91. What would be the goal or target for a Medical history’s improvement team?
<--- Score
92. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
93. What is in scope?
<--- Score
94. Is the Medical history scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
95. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Medical history results are met?
<--- Score
96. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
97. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
98. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
99. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
100. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
101. How do you catch Medical history definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
102. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
103. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not,