Score
98. How do you think the partners involved in Virtual operating system would have defined success?
<--- Score
99. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
100. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
101. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Virtual operating system changes?
<--- Score
102. Will team members regularly document their Virtual operating system work?
<--- Score
103. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
104. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
105. What are the record-keeping requirements of Virtual operating system activities?
<--- Score
106. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
107. Is there any additional Virtual operating system definition of success?
<--- Score
108. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
109. How can the value of Virtual operating system be defined?
<--- Score
110. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
111. Do you have a Virtual operating system success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
112. What is the context?
<--- Score
113. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
114. Is special Virtual operating system user knowledge required?
<--- Score
115. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
116. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
117. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
118. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
119. What is the definition of Virtual operating system excellence?
<--- Score
120. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
121. Is there a critical path to deliver Virtual operating system results?
<--- Score
122. What is the scope of the Virtual operating system work?
<--- Score
123. How do you hand over Virtual operating system context?
<--- Score
124. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
125. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
126. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Virtual operating system?
<--- Score
127. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
128. What is in scope?
<--- Score
129. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
130. How will the Virtual operating system team and the group measure complete success of Virtual operating system?
<--- Score
131. Is the Virtual operating system scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
132. What are the Virtual operating system use cases?
<--- Score
133. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
134. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
135. How have you defined all Virtual operating system requirements first?
<--- Score
136. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
137. When is/was the Virtual operating system start date?
<--- Score
138. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Virtual operating system Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance
