Is the Standard data model scope manageable?
<--- Score
104. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
105. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
106. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
107. What was the context?
<--- Score
108. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
109. Have all basic functions of Standard data model been defined?
<--- Score
110. What are (control) requirements for Standard data model Information?
<--- Score
111. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
112. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
113. What Standard data model services do you require?
<--- Score
114. Will team members perform Standard data model work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
115. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
116. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
117. How do you catch Standard data model definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
118. Will team members regularly document their Standard data model work?
<--- Score
119. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Standard data model?
<--- Score
120. Is Standard data model linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
121. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
122. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
123. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
124. What happens if Standard data model’s scope changes?
<--- Score
125. Why are you doing Standard data model and what is the scope?
<--- Score
126. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
127. Is there any additional Standard data model definition of success?
<--- Score
128. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
129. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
130. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
131. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
132. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
133. How do you manage changes in Standard data model requirements?
<--- Score
134. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
135. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Standard data model Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
2. What are your key Standard data model organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
3. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
4. What are the Standard data model key cost drivers?
<--- Score
5. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
6.
