<--- Score
10. Who is gathering Transparent context information?
<--- Score
11. Will team members perform Transparent context work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
12. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
13. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
14. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
15. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
16. Is there a critical path to deliver Transparent context results?
<--- Score
17. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
18. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
19. Are the Transparent context requirements testable?
<--- Score
20. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
21. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
22. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
23. Is there a clear Transparent context case definition?
<--- Score
24. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Transparent context? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
25. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
26. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
27. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
28. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
29. Is the Transparent context scope manageable?
<--- Score
30. Will team members regularly document their Transparent context work?
<--- Score
31. What would be the goal or target for a Transparent context’s improvement team?
<--- Score
32. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
33. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Transparent context goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
34. What are the record-keeping requirements of Transparent context activities?
<--- Score
35. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
36. What was the context?
<--- Score
37. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
38. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
39. How can the value of Transparent context be defined?
<--- Score
40. What sources do you use to gather information for a Transparent context study?
<--- Score
41. What gets examined?
<--- Score
42. Is the scope of Transparent context defined?
<--- Score
43. How would you define Transparent context leadership?
<--- Score
44. What is the definition of Transparent context excellence?
<--- Score
45. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
46. Is Transparent context required?
<--- Score
47. How will the Transparent context team and the group measure complete success of Transparent context?
<--- Score
48. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
49. What Transparent context requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
50. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
51. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
52. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
53. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
54. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
55.
