Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
56. What are (control) requirements for Transparent context Information?
<--- Score
57. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
58. Who approved the Transparent context scope?
<--- Score
59. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
60. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
61. What are the Transparent context use cases?
<--- Score
62. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
63. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
64. How do you gather Transparent context requirements?
<--- Score
65. Are the Transparent context requirements complete?
<--- Score
66. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
67. How does the Transparent context manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
68. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
69. How do you think the partners involved in Transparent context would have defined success?
<--- Score
70. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Transparent context results are met?
<--- Score
71. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Transparent context brings?
<--- Score
72. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
73. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
74. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
75. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
76. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
77. Has a Transparent context requirement not been met?
<--- Score
78. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
79. How are consistent Transparent context definitions important?
<--- Score
80. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
81. Is the Transparent context scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
82. How have you defined all Transparent context requirements first?
<--- Score
83. Why are you doing Transparent context and what is the scope?
<--- Score
84. How did the Transparent context manager receive input to the development of a Transparent context improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
85. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
86. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Transparent context work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
87. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
88. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
89. Will a Transparent context production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
90. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
91. What is the context?
<--- Score
92. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
93. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
94. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
95. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
96. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
97. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
98. Has the Transparent context work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the
