concerns about the High Finance team, High Finance itself?
<--- Score
78. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
79. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
80. What are your needs in relation to High Finance skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
81. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
82. For your High Finance project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?
<--- Score
83. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?
<--- Score
84. What does High Finance success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
85. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?
<--- Score
86. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
87. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
88. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
89. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
90. Have you identified your High Finance key performance indicators?
<--- Score
91. How do you assess your High Finance workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
92. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate High Finance delivery, for example is new software needed?
<--- Score
93. What High Finance events should you attend?
<--- Score
94. Did you miss any major High Finance issues?
<--- Score
95. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of High Finance?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the High Finance Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
2. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
3. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
4. Is there a critical path to deliver High Finance results?
<--- Score
5. What is the scope of High Finance?
<--- Score
6. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
7. How do you manage unclear High Finance requirements?
<--- Score
8. Is High Finance required?
<--- Score
9. Is there a High Finance management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
10. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
11. What are the High Finance use cases?
<--- Score
12. How do you manage changes in High Finance requirements?
<--- Score
13. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
14. Is the High Finance scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
15. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
16. What is the scope of the High Finance work?
<--- Score
17. How does the High Finance manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
18. How would you define High Finance leadership?
<--- Score
19. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
20. Where can you gather more information?
