is the context?
<--- Score
57. What Hardware as a service services do you require?
<--- Score
58. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
59. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
60. Are the Hardware as a service requirements testable?
<--- Score
61. What are (control) requirements for Hardware as a service Information?
<--- Score
62. How do you think the partners involved in Hardware as a service would have defined success?
<--- Score
63. What is the scope?
<--- Score
64. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
65. Why are you doing Hardware as a service and what is the scope?
<--- Score
66. Will team members regularly document their Hardware as a service work?
<--- Score
67. Who is gathering Hardware as a service information?
<--- Score
68. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
69. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
70. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
71. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
72. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
73. Are the Hardware as a service requirements complete?
<--- Score
74. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
75. Is there any additional Hardware as a service definition of success?
<--- Score
76. Have all basic functions of Hardware as a service been defined?
<--- Score
77. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
78. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
79. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
80. What system do you use for gathering Hardware as a service information?
<--- Score
81. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
82. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Hardware as a service work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
83. Who approved the Hardware as a service scope?
<--- Score
84. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
85. Is there a critical path to deliver Hardware as a service results?
<--- Score
86. What is the scope of the Hardware as a service work?
<--- Score
87. What would be the goal or target for a Hardware as a service’s improvement team?
<--- Score
88. Is the Hardware as a service scope manageable?
<--- Score
89. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Hardware as a service changes?
<--- Score
90. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Hardware as a service goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
91. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
92. Do you have a Hardware as a service success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
93. What are the Hardware as a service use cases?
<--- Score
94. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
95. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
96. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
97. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
98. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
99. Is the Hardware as a service scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
100. How can the value of Hardware as a service be defined?
<--- Score
101.
