been defined?
<--- Score
59. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
60. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
61. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
62. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
63. Are the Healthcare technician requirements complete?
<--- Score
64. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
65. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
66. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
67. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
68. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
69. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Healthcare technician brings?
<--- Score
70. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
71. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Healthcare technician leverage and how?
<--- Score
72. What is the context?
<--- Score
73. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
74. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
75. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
76. How do you hand over Healthcare technician context?
<--- Score
77. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
78. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
79. How do you manage unclear Healthcare technician requirements?
<--- Score
80. Who is gathering Healthcare technician information?
<--- Score
81. Do you have a Healthcare technician success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
82. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
83. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
84. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
85. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
86. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
87. How would you define Healthcare technician leadership?
<--- Score
88. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
89. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
90. What is the scope of the Healthcare technician effort?
<--- Score
91. Who are the Healthcare technician improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
92. What gets examined?
<--- Score
93. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
94. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
95. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
96. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
97. How do you gather Healthcare technician requirements?
<--- Score
98. Is the scope of Healthcare technician defined?
<--- Score
99. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
100. What is in scope?
<--- Score
101. What is the scope of Healthcare technician?
<--- Score
102. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
103. Is the Healthcare technician scope complete and appropriately sized?
<---
