What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
9. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Geospatial intelligence? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
10. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
11. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
12. Will team members regularly document their Geospatial intelligence work?
<--- Score
13. Has the Geospatial intelligence work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
14. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
15. How does the Geospatial intelligence manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
16. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
17. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
18. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
19. Is Geospatial intelligence linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
20. Has a Geospatial intelligence requirement not been met?
<--- Score
21. How are consistent Geospatial intelligence definitions important?
<--- Score
22. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
23. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
24. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Geospatial intelligence goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
25. How do you manage unclear Geospatial intelligence requirements?
<--- Score
26. Is the Geospatial intelligence scope manageable?
<--- Score
27. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
28. What is the scope?
<--- Score
29. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
30. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
31. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Geospatial intelligence leverage and how?
<--- Score
32. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
33. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
34. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
35. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
36. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
37. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
38. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
39. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
40. What are the Geospatial intelligence tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
41. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
42. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
43. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
44. Are the Geospatial intelligence requirements testable?
<--- Score
45. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
46. How did the Geospatial intelligence manager receive input to the development of a Geospatial intelligence improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
47. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
48. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
49. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
50. When is the estimated completion date?
<---
